NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
American Journal of Evaluation66
Audience
Researchers2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Workforce Investment Act 19981
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 66 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tucker, Susan; Stevahn, Laurie; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article compares the purposes and content of the four foundational documents of the American Evaluation Association (AEA): the Program Evaluation Standards, the AEA Public Statement on Cultural Competence in Evaluation, the AEA Evaluator Competencies, and the AEA Guiding Principles. This reflection on alignment is an early effort in the third…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Comparative Analysis, Professional Associations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teasdale, Rebecca M.; McNeilly, Jennifer R.; Garzón, Maria Isabel Ramírez; Novak, Judit; Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This study challenges persistent misrepresentations of evaluation as a value-neutral inquiry process by presenting an empirical study that deepens understanding of evaluators' values and how they "show up" in evaluation practice. Through semistructured interviews and inductive analysis, we examined the values advanced by a sample of…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Values, Evaluation, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
John M. LaVelle; Clayton L. Stephenson; Scott I. Donaldson; Justin D. Hackett – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
Psychological theory suggests that evaluators' individual values and traits play a fundamental role in evaluation practice, though few empirical studies have explored those constructs in evaluators. This paper describes an empirical study on evaluators' individual, work, and political values, as well as their personality traits to predict…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Values, Political Attitudes, Work Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mapitsa, Caitlin Blaser; Ngwato, Tara Polzer – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
As global discussions of evaluation standards become more contextually nuanced, culturally responsive conceptions of ethics have not been sufficiently discussed. In academic social research, ethical clearance processes have been designed to protect vulnerable people from harm related to participation in a research project. This article expands the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Ethics, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rodriguez, Sophia; Acree, Jeremy – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
This article problematizes methodological practices, specifically the use of surveys as tools of measurement in evaluation with migrant youth. Drawing from Foucault's "Genealogy of Ethics," we investigate the knowledge created about particular minoritized groups through the author's current evaluation, the power relations involved, and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Surveys, Migrants, Youth
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alkin, Marvin C.; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
The second article in this series on the history of evaluation use has three sections. The first and longest develops a functional definition of the term "use," noting that a thorough definition of evaluation use includes the initial stimulus (i.e., evaluation findings or process), the user, the way people use the information, the aspect…
Descriptors: Definitions, Users (Information), Ethics, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julnes, George; Bustelo, Maria – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Efforts to promote professionalism in evaluation, whether through certification, credentialing, or other path, are not new, but there is a new push to adopt sets of essential evaluator competencies, both in the United States and globally, that are intended to advance professionalism of the field. This emphasis on professionalism is relevant to the…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Travis R. Moore; Luke Carmichael Valmadrid; Robyn Baragwanath; Nathaniel Haack; Lori Bakken – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The ethical guidelines for the American Evaluation Association and the principles of community-based participatory evaluation both state the importance of equitable stakeholder involvement. Regardless of the evaluation approach, however, evaluators are often confronted with gatekeepers, or those who control the access to stakeholders, information,…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Evaluators, Ethics, Community Involvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mustonen, Tero – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
The applicability of Indigenous ethics to the evaluation of ecological restoration is explored through two case examples involving the Indigenous Sámi rivers of Näätämö and Ponoi in the European North. Six key restoration approaches are described that would have been overlooked had it not been for the use of Indigenous ethics from the start of the…
Descriptors: Indigenous Knowledge, Ethics, Conservation (Environment), Earth Science
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schwandt, Thomas A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Current discussion of the professionalization of the practice of evaluation is focused on matters of competencies and credentialing and largely overlooks several significant issues. These include conflating professionalizing the practice with promoting the value of evaluation as a social good, assuming there is widespread agreement on what the…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Professional Identity, Ethics, Fidelity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Picciotto, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
The adversary evaluation model emerged in a context that favored democratic debate. It was successfully used in a variety of sectors following its inception, but it was abandoned once neo-liberal thinking and goal achievement approaches became dominant. It is time to give it a second chance. The judicial evaluation model (JEM) relies on human…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Democracy, Justice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chilisa, Bagele; Mertens, Donna M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
Transformative change is needed if the world is to achieve the sustainable development goals. Such change requires attention to culture, ethics, and values. We discuss the need to be responsive to the voices of Indigenous scholars in terms of the assumptions that guide methodological choices in the evaluation of international initiatives. We…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods, Social Change, Cultural Relevance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grob, George F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
This article is the fifth in a series on the relationship of evaluation theory and practice. It was commissioned by the Eastern Evaluation Research Society and the American Evaluation Association as part of The Chelimsky Forum, launched in 2013 to honor Eleanor Chelimsky, one of the most influential and respected program evaluators of our era, and…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Wilson, Lyssa N.; Westine, Carl D.; Hobson, Kristin A.; Ozeki, Satoshi; Fiekowsky, Erica L.; Greenman, Gregory D., II; Schröter, Daniela C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Although investigations into evaluation theories, methods, and practices have been occurring since the late 1970s, research on evaluation (RoE) has seemingly increased in the past decade. In this review, 257 studies published in 14 evaluation-focused journals over a 10-year period (between 2005 and 2014) were identified as RoE and then classified…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Journal Articles, Literature Reviews, Taxonomy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patton, Michael Quinn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Our understanding of programs is enhanced when trained, skilled, and observant evaluators go "into the field"--the real world where programs are conducted--paying attention to what's going on, systematically documenting what they see, and reporting what they learn. The article opens by presenting and illustrating twelve reasons for…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Design Requirements, Field Studies
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5