Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Academic Questions | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 3 |
Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Grutter et al v Bollinger et… | 2 |
Bakke v Regents of University… | 1 |
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title VI | 1 |
Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
Gratz et al v Bollinger et al | 1 |
Plessy v Ferguson | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
La Noue, George R. – Academic Questions, 2013
This article describes the outcomes of the case "Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin," in which the plaintiff had accused the University of Texas (UT) of racial discrimination in the admission process. The author believes that the ruling of the court in this case makes it harder to hide race-based measures used in college admissions.…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Affirmative Action, College Admission, Admission Criteria
Nieli, Russell K. – Academic Questions, 2013
Russell K. Nieli writes in this opinion paper that as far as the ability of state colleges and universities to use race as a criteria for admission goes, "Fisher v. Texas" was a big disappointment, and failed in the most basic way. Nieli states that although some affirmative action opponents have tried to put a more positive spin on the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Affirmative Action, College Admission, Admission Criteria
Clegg, Roger; Rosenberg, John S. – Academic Questions, 2012
The Supreme Court has granted review for the 2012 term in the case "Fisher v. University of Texas." Abigail Fisher, a rejected white applicant to the University of Texas, has challenged the use of racial and ethnic admission preferences, which the Court had allowed in its 2003 decision involving the University of Michigan law school,…
Descriptors: Evidence, Affirmative Action, Educational Benefits, Court Litigation