NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 16 to 20 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Academe, 1984
In a statement of the American Association of University Professors' Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, recently imposed government restraints on disclosure of academic research results are criticized as adding to already excessive restrictions, compromising academic freedom, and susceptible to executive manipulation. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Censorship, College Role, Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Strohm, Paul – Academe, 1986
A discussion by endorsers of the American Association of University Professors' (AAUP) 1940 statement on academic freedom and tenure is summarized, including the topics of academic accuracy watchdogs, government constraints on academic freedom, irregular faculty appointments and periodic review, special issues at church-related colleges, and the…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, Agency Role, Church Related Colleges
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Doney, Lloyd D.; Trebby, James P. – Academe, 1997
Although a casual analysis might suggest that a faculty member cannot afford a two-term sabbatical leave, factors affecting income loss from sabbaticals have changed. These include an increase in the number of two-income households, general increases in salary levels, and substantial revisions in federal tax law. Income loss from sabbaticals,…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Economic Change, Family Income
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Park, Robert L. – Academe, 1986
The effects of government restraints on the process of free interaction between scientists is discussed. The careless application of export control laws to the transfer of information is described. Applicable statutes include: the Atomic Energy Act, the Invention Secrecy Act, the Arms Export Control Act, etc. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Censorship, Conferences, Exports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scales, Ann C.; And Others – Academe, 1990
A Supreme Court decision supporting disclosure of university faculty peer review files is discussed by faculty in law and other disciplines and by a college president. Arguments address the principles of academic privilege, institutional mission, and the soundness of academic decision making. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Administrator Attitudes, College Faculty, College Presidents
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1  |  2