NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thompson Coon, Jo; Gwernan-Jones, Ruth; Garside, Ruth; Nunns, Michael; Shaw, Liz; Melendez-Torres, G. J.; Moore, Darren – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
The incorporation of evidence derived from multiple research designs into one single synthesis can enhance the utility of systematic reviews making them more worthwhile, useful, and insightful. Methodological guidance for mixed-methods synthesis continues to emerge and evolve but broadly involves a sequential, parallel, or convergent approach…
Descriptors: Evidence, Medical Research, Mixed Methods Research, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aida Lopez Ruiz; Prateek Shekhar; Aileen Huang-Saad; Jacqueline Handley – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
Although several entrepreneurship education programs (EEPs) have been created for faculty, research examining women faculty experiences participating in EEPs is minimal and particularly negligible in the context of their academic research. To address this gap, we examine women faculty's perceptions and experiences toward EEPs in the context of…
Descriptors: Women Faculty, Entrepreneurship, Phenomenology, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Alice; Nisselle, Amy; Weller-Newton, Jennifer; McClaren, Belinda; Keogh, Louise – Vocations and Learning, 2022
Workplace learning is fundamental in contextualizing theoretical concepts into practice, making it opportune for professionals to learn emerging concepts. With genomic testing transitioning from the research space into healthcare, there are more opportunities to engage with workplace learning related to genomic medicine. We therefore aimed to…
Descriptors: Workplace Learning, Concept Formation, Genetics, Medicine
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brunton, Ginny; Webbe, James; Oliver, Sandy; Gale, Chris – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Trials evaluating the same interventions rarely measure or report identical outcomes. This limits the possibility of aggregating effect sizes across studies to generate high-quality evidence through systematic reviews and meta-analyses. To address this problem, core outcome sets (COS) establish agreed sets of outcomes to be used in all future…
Descriptors: Intervention, Outcome Measures, Effect Size, Qualitative Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marešová, Petra; Soukal, Ivan; Stemberkova, Ruzena; Selamat, Ali – Education and Urban Society, 2022
In the current day and age, innovation is the fodder that keeps companies and institutions running, and universities play an important role. During the crisis and in the post-crisis period, financial support for research and development have undergone significant changes especially at universities. The aim of this research is to conduct a patent…
Descriptors: Financial Support, State Universities, Innovation, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ulferts, Gregory W.; Cannon, Nicholas J.; Howard, Terry L. – Research in Higher Education Journal, 2021
This research seeks to describe the continuing predicament of R&D funding in the U.S. and to provide support for a return to higher R&D spending as a proportion of GDP to maintain American leadership in innovation. Historically, government investment has funded most foundational scientific research leading to technological advances in…
Descriptors: Research and Development, Financial Support, Scientific Research, Federal Aid
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lindner, Mark D.; Vancea, Adrian; Chen, Mei-Ching; Chacko, George – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest source of funding for biomedical research in the world. Funding decisions are made largely based on the outcome of a peer review process that is intended to provide a fair, equitable, timely, and unbiased review of the quality, scientific merit, and potential impact of the research. There have…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Biomedicine, Peer Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Radnor, Michael; And Others – 1977
Part 2 of a three-part volume for research and development systems researchers, this report attempts to apply the contextual analysis framework of research, development, and innovation (RD & I) activities presented in Part 1. The authors make a detailed analysis of RD & I activities in the sectors of education, civilian aviation, health,…
Descriptors: Administration, Aviation Technology, Communication (Thought Transfer), Comparative Analysis