Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Biology | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Introductory Courses | 2 |
| Retention (Psychology) | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Ability Grouping | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Cohort Analysis | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Calkins, Robin | 1 |
| Clarkston, Bridgette | 1 |
| Cooke, James E. | 1 |
| Leight, Hayley | 1 |
| Saunders, Cheston | 1 |
| Weir, Laura | 1 |
| Withers, Michelle | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCooke, James E.; Weir, Laura; Clarkston, Bridgette – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2019
Multistage collaborative exams are implemented to enhance learning and retention of course material. However, the effects of multistage collaborative exams on retention of course content are varied. These discrepancies may be due to a number of factors. To date, studies examining collaborative exams and content retention have used questions that…
Descriptors: Retention (Psychology), Test Format, Responses, Student Evaluation
Leight, Hayley; Saunders, Cheston; Calkins, Robin; Withers, Michelle – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2012
Collaborative testing has been shown to improve performance but not always content retention. In this study, we investigated whether collaborative testing could improve both performance and content retention in a large, introductory biology course. Students were semirandomly divided into two groups based on their performances on exam 1. Each group…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Biology, Scoring, Group Testing
