Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Correnti, Richard | 2 |
| Howe, Emily | 2 |
| Litman, Diane | 1 |
| Magooda, Ahmed | 1 |
| Matsumura, Lindsay Clare | 1 |
| Quintana, Rafael | 1 |
| Wang, Elaine Lin | 1 |
| Zhang, Haoran | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkHowe, Emily; Correnti, Richard – Grantee Submission, 2020
An increased emphasis on writing standards has led many U.S. states to incorporate on-demand writing assessments into their test-based accountability system. We argue this creates political and pedagogical tensions for teachers to navigate. We discuss how rubric conceptualization (1) is a process wherein a teacher iteratively (co-)constructs…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Standards, Accountability
Wang, Elaine Lin; Matsumura, Lindsay Clare; Correnti, Richard; Litman, Diane; Zhang, Haoran; Howe, Emily; Magooda, Ahmed; Quintana, Rafael – Grantee Submission, 2020
We investigate students' implementation of the feedback messages they received in an automated writing evaluation system ("eRevise") that aims to improve students' use of text evidence in their writing. Seven 5th and 6th-grade teachers implemented "eRevise" (n = 143 students). Qualitative analysis of students' essays across…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Grade 5
