Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Abedi, Jamal | 3 |
| Guzman-Orth, Danielle | 1 |
| Kao, Jenny C. | 1 |
| Lee, Hansol | 1 |
| Leon, Seth | 1 |
| Rowe, Susan E. | 1 |
| Wolf, Mikyung Kim | 1 |
| Yoo, Hanwook | 1 |
| Zhang, Yu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 9 | 3 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWolf, Mikyung Kim; Yoo, Hanwook; Guzman-Orth, Danielle; Abedi, Jamal – Educational Assessment, 2022
Implementing a randomized controlled trial design, the present study investigated the effects of two types of accommodations, linguistic modification and a glossary, for English learners (ELs) taking a computer-based mathematics assessment. Process data including response time and clicks on glossary words were also examined to better interpret…
Descriptors: Testing Accommodations, English Language Learners, Computer Assisted Testing, Mathematics Tests
Abedi, Jamal; Zhang, Yu; Rowe, Susan E.; Lee, Hansol – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
Research indicates that the performance-gap between English Language Learners (ELLs) and their non-ELL peers is partly due to ELLs' difficulty in understanding assessment language. Accommodations have been shown to narrow this performance-gap, but many accommodations studies have not used a randomized design and are based on relatively small…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Achievement Gap, Mathematics Tests, Standards
Download full textAbedi, Jamal; Leon, Seth; Kao, Jenny C. – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2008
This study examines performance differences between students with disabilities and students without disabilities students using differential item functioning (DIF) analyses in a high-stakes reading assessment. Results indicated that for Grade 9, many items exhibited DIF. Items that exhibited DIF were more likely to be located in the second half…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Items, Student Evaluation, Disabilities
