NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Siders, James A. – College Student Journal, 1983
Advocates both summative and formative student evaluation incorporating instructor, peer, and self-evaluation. Presents two examples of the rating format for illustration, and suggests that the key to the feedback depends on the consistency among the sources. Results should contribute to final grades. (JAC)
Descriptors: College Students, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Remley, Theodore P., Jr.; And Others – Counselor Education and Supervision, 1987
Notes that many counselors find themselves in settings where supervision of their clinical skills is not available. Proposes a peer supervision model that will provide practitioners with an opportunity to monitor their practice, improve their self-confidence, and further develop their counseling skills. (Author)
Descriptors: Counselor Evaluation, Counselors, Models, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burke, William T.; Allen, C. Larry – Journal of Education for Business, 1987
The authors discuss criteria for evaluating teachers' classroom performance and especially innovative performance. They also suggest a model structure for teacher evaluation. (CH)
Descriptors: Classroom Research, Classroom Techniques, Innovation, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Justiz, Manuel J.; Moorman, Hunter N. – Educational Researcher, 1985
Describes the history of peer review at the National Institute of Education (NIE) and discusses some broad principles of federal research management and peer review. Notes recent recommendations for improvement in peer review procedures and sketches procedures that will guide NIE in an upcoming lab and center competition. (Author/KH)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Grants, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shulman, Lee S. – Educational Researcher, 1985
Describes administrative changes at the National Institute of Education (NIE) over the last four years and relates these to NIE's recent revision of its peer review system. Briefly describes changes in peer review and asserts that the new system provides researchers great opportunity for participation in maintaining quality research. (KH)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Educational Researchers, Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation
General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. Div. of Human Resources. – 1986
This report concerns the Health Care Financing Administration's (HCFA) contracting with Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organizations (PROs) as a means of monitoring the medical necessity and quality of in-hospital care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Findings from a HCFA survey of PROs in California, Florida, and Georgia are used…
Descriptors: Health Needs, Hospitals, Medical Care Evaluation, Medical Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sanders, Howard J. – Chemical and Engineering News, 1982
Summarizes and reviews the peer review system of evaluating research proposals by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institute of Health. Includes National Academy of Sciences study of NSF peer review, appeals mechanism, and alternatives to peer review, such as Black grants and research productivity criteria. (SK)
Descriptors: College Science, Financial Support, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Edgerton, Russell; And Others – 1991
This report argues a case for the use of professional teaching portfolios by educators in higher education, advances a point of view about portfolio issues, and offers examples of portfolio entries. A work-sample-plus-reflection model is presented as a guide for what might be included in a portfolio and why it might be used at a particular campus.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Guidelines, Higher Education, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Osman, Shelomo; Shueman, Sharon A. – Social Work, 1988
Explores legal requirements, ethical tenets, documentation standards and skills involved, and clinical implications of peer review by clinical social workers. Emphasizes provider participation in the review process to facilitate a positive review outcome. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: Ethics, Legal Responsibility, Peer Evaluation, Skills
Levine, John M. – 1983
The classroom environment elicits social comparison behavior in which a student uses peers' performance as a gauge for his own self-assessment. Social comparison as it relates to ability is a four phase sequential process. In phase one, stimulation of social comparison is elicited through developmentally-determined cognitive capacities and motives…
Descriptors: Classroom Design, Classroom Environment, Cognitive Development, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Atkinson, Richard C.; Blanpied, William A. – Issues in Science and Technology, 1985
Argues that both science and society will be better served if the scientific community recognizes that it must assume a strong, coherent negotiating stance in its relationship with government as it did 40 years ago. Defense of the peer review principle is essential to the achievement of this stance. (JN)
Descriptors: Government Role, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Russo, Charles J.; And Others – Initiatives, 1990
Notes that, in "University of Pennsylvania versus Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1990)," Supreme Court held that university is not entitled to common law privilege to withhold confidential peer review documents from federal agency investigating allegations of employment discrimination. Reviews case and considers potentially…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Confidentiality, Court Litigation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kerchner, Charles Taylor – Education Next, 2001
Reports on union-negotiated reforms in several large urban school districts that included peer review, teacher induction, professional development, and performance rewards. (PKP)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Induction, Peer Evaluation, Professional Development
Cordes, Colleen – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1988
Congress has quietly approved millions of dollars for campus research projects not subjected to traditional merit reviews. The wisdom of allowing legislators to direct federal money to specific campuses is questioned less and less, and the practice is more prevalent than ever. (MSE)
Descriptors: Eligibility, Federal Aid, Fund Raising, Higher Education
Lee, Sang Joon – Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 2004
The development of technologies enables us to create online learning environments. As online learning is expanding its role in higher education, it becomes one of fundamental issues how to create online learning environments to facilitate online interaction. One of the methods is using a discussion board where learners can interact with other…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Educational Technology, Peer Evaluation, Higher Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2