NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 76 to 90 of 257 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coughlan, Reed – Distance Education, 1980
This paper discusses the role of mentors in individualized learning at Empire State College. This individualized learning program and the components of the role of mentor are defined and illustrated. (Available: School of External Studies, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, 167 Franklin Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.) (CT)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Individualized Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morehead, Jere W.; Shedd, Peter J. – Innovative Higher Education, 1997
Examines the differences in summative and formative evaluation of college teaching, and suggests a new model for peer review of teaching that uses colleagues from other campuses (external review) for summative evaluation. Argues that traditional student evaluation and on-campus peer evaluation (internal review) discourage innovations in teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gray, Peter J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991
Assessment of college teaching is viewed broadly as the gathering of information for understanding and improving teaching as well as judging its quality. It is seen to play a crucial support role at each stage of instructional development: problem clarification, instructional design/redesign, and field testing and implementation. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Data Collection, Faculty Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Pitts, Ben E.; Fletcher, Richard K. – 1977
This study investigated the attitudes of college administrators in the Southeast toward different types of publications when an academician is considered for promotion. An instrument was designed around 10 selected avenues of publication including nationally, regionally, and institutionally refereed journals, national and regional magazines read…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Books, College Administration, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dombeck, Mary T. – Nursing Outlook, 1986
Examines the three-pronged approach of the theme-centered interactional model that was adapted for use in a faculty clinician peer review group. The model involves the cognitive focus, the affective focus, and the interactional focus. Each approach is examined in detail. (CT)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines, Higher Education, Nursing Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roskens, Ronald W. – Research in Higher Education, 1983
The Biglan model of classification of academic subject areas is outlined, and its practical implications and uses by administrators for faculty evaluation are discussed. The reasons for applying subject-area standards in faculty productivity studies are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classification, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saaty, Thomas L.; Ramanujam, Vasudevan – Research in Higher Education, 1983
A faculty evaluation system that classified performance factors within a hierarchy and weights each, producing a final composite set for each faculty member, is explained and illustrated. The process is recommended for more objective and consistent decision-making about faculty tenure. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hogan, Timothy D. – Journal of Human Resources, 1981
This study examines the relationships between program size, the quality of entrants and of the faculty, the faculty's published research output, and the average quality of the Ph.D.s during the 1960s trained by the top thirty-six U.S. graduate programs in economics. (Author)
Descriptors: Economics Education, Educational Quality, Faculty Evaluation, Graduate School Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Theall, Michael; Franklin, Jennifer – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
Student ratings reflect the variety and range of teacher behaviors and the instructional successes and failures. Although researchers, practitioners, and users of rating systems acknowledge their multidimensionality, it is not fully used. Understanding the context of evaluations and identifying how intended uses and audiences affect data…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Improvement, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bowers, John K. – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1989
A method is proposed for developing a universitywide faculty evaluation system while retaining the integrity of evaluations of each individual's performance. Suggestions parallel efforts to alter faculty evaluation at Northwest Missouri State University (Maryville). (SLD)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hattie, John; And Others – Australian Journal of Education, 1994
It is proposed that, in evaluation of higher education, the individual faculty member is a more appropriate unit of analysis than institution or department. A study of faculty (n=2,048) productivity in publishing scholarly journal articles provides evidence supporting this view. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tagomori, Harry T.; Bishop, Laurence A. – Thought & Action, 1995
A study analyzed the content of 200 instruments used in student evaluation of college classroom teaching performance. Three specific kinds of flaws were examined: ambiguous, unclear, or subjective evaluation items; ambiguous, skewed, or unclear responses to evaluation items; and items that did not characterize classroom teaching performance. (MSE)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lacey, Paul A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
Although publishing has been the sole form of faculty scholarship rewarded, alternative forms should be encouraged and used in evaluating faculty. Scholarly work, the best way for college teachers to keep vitalized, can be assessed as effectively as traditional research activities. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Change, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abel, Richard L. – Journal of Legal Education, 1990
A study investigated the actual practices of 84 law schools in evaluating their faculty and compared them to studies by educators and psychologists about the assessment process. Certain dangers are found to be inherent in current evaluation methods, and suggestions for improving instructional evaluation are offered. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Meara, Kerry Ann – Journal of Higher Education, 2004
This article draws upon the literature on academic culture and the academic profession to provide a context for beliefs about post-tenure review. Schein's (1992) theory of organizational culture and Kuh & Whitt's (1988) application of cultural theory to higher education settings divides culture into a conceptual hierarchy comprised of three…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Faculty Evaluation, Academic Freedom, Tenure
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  18