Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 29 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 97 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 249 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 651 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Cousins, J. Bradley | 3 |
Golding, Barry | 3 |
Armstrong, John | 2 |
Ashwin, Paul | 2 |
Bardak, Ummuhan | 2 |
Beerkens, Maarja | 2 |
Bennell, Paul | 2 |
Blattler, Andrea | 2 |
Bodilly, Susan J. | 2 |
Butler, Deirdre | 2 |
Campbell, Coral | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 13 |
Administrators | 6 |
Practitioners | 6 |
Students | 4 |
Researchers | 3 |
Teachers | 3 |
Counselors | 2 |
Community | 1 |
Media Staff | 1 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Australia | 47 |
United Kingdom | 37 |
Canada | 36 |
United States | 27 |
United Kingdom (England) | 23 |
California | 21 |
New Zealand | 20 |
Netherlands | 16 |
South Africa | 15 |
United Kingdom (Scotland) | 15 |
Finland | 14 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 1 |

English, Brian – Evaluation Practice, 1997
This paper examines issues involved in conducting evaluations when participation by the target groups, typically minorities and disadvantaged groups, may put them in jeopardy. Argues that participation by target groups as cooperative partners throughout the evaluation is a way of addressing this dilemma. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Economically Disadvantaged, Ethics, Evaluation Methods

Freer, Kevin J.; Spruitenburg, Martha K. – PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 1996
Interviews with stakeholders in an adult literacy program for university employees (instructor, program director, 17 of 34 employees, 11 of 20 supervisors) showed similar perceptions of improvement in skill, confidence, and self-esteem, participation in decision making, and involvement in lifelong learning. Better communication between supervisors…
Descriptors: Adult Basic Education, Outcomes of Education, Participant Satisfaction, Participatory Research
Davidson, Candelaria Perez – 1993
Evaluators frequently experience the dilemma of how to empower a program staff if the staff and other stakeholders are compelled to participate in activities that they don't believe they need or believe may actually harm the program. A framework is proposed to empower program staff and other stakeholders and to reduce potential dilemmas. The…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Empowerment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Horsch, Karen, Ed.; Weiss, Heather B., Ed. – 1998
Family resource centers (FRC) are emerging as a promising program approach to solving urgent social problems. Evaluation plays an important role in learning how these programs work, what their impact is, and whether they should be expanded. However, FRCs pose unique challenges to evaluation. This report considers the challenges to evaluating FRCs,…
Descriptors: Community Programs, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems

Mathie, Alison; Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997
The grounded experiences of two participatory evaluation case studies indicate that, when action is the desired outcome of an evaluation, somewhat less rather than more diversity of stakeholder participation is actually what is wanted. A narrowing of diversity is not necessarily in violation of democratic participatory aims. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Cultural Pluralism, Democracy, Evaluation Methods

Russell, Neil; Willinsky, John – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1997
Postmodern approaches to school-level evaluation by building on the fourth-generation evaluation model developed by E. Guba and Y. Lincoln are suggested. It is argued that this conceptualization of evaluation has particular relevance for development of alternative evaluation practices among stakeholders that can improve the use of evaluation…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Mountford, Meredith; Ylimaki, Rose – Journal of School Leadership, 2005
This article draws on a reanalysis of findings from two separate qualitative studies that examined a possible relationship between school board members' and curriculum directors' conceptions of power and the way they made decisions (Mountford, 2001; Ylimaki, 2001, respectively). The findings from both studies were then compared to the extant…
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Principals, Attitudes, Power Structure

Fleischer, Mitchell – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1984
Two main themes are found in the previous critiques (TM 510 180, TM 510 181, and TM 510 182) of the Tellado evaluation (TM 510 179): that Tellado lacked a clear audience for his evaluation and that he lacked an appropriate change orientation. A major problem with utilization-focused and stakeholder-based approaches to evaluation is revealed.…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Junior High Schools

Clayson, Zoe Cardoza; Castaneda, Xochitl; Sanchez, Emma; Brindis, Claire – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Studied community initiatives in several low-income California Latino communities over 5 years. Results of these analyses show the challenges of blending a critical theory social science approach with community-focused evaluation practice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Evaluation Methods, Hispanic Americans, Low Income Groups

Garaway, G. B. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1995
Current conceptualizations of participatory evaluation are reviewed, presenting some definitions, various rationales for its use, and a general discussion with implications for future applications. Participatory evaluation creates a learning framework in which evaluation findings are processed and accumulated by end-users in the very process of…
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods

Mueller, Marsha R.; Fitzpatrick, Jody L. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
The evaluation of Minnesota's Early Childhood Family Education program is described, and a dialog between one of the evaluators and an editor of this journal provides further insight into the evaluation process. Noteworthy in this evaluation, called exemplary by the American Evaluation Association, was highly motivated collaboration of evaluation…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Family Programs
McPherson, Peter; Shulenburger, David – National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, 2006
Every public university is engaged now in serious and ongoing accountability appraisal with significant time and resources dedicated to the task. The academy's commitment to accountability is real. Focusing on accountability for undergraduate education, one of several important functions of public universities satisfies a need, but it should not…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Universities, Accountability, Public Colleges
Van Loo, Jasper B.; Rocco, Tonette S. – Human Resource Development Review, 2006
The differences between continuing professional education (CPE) and training are examined by presenting a systems view of the factors that make CPE different from training. The authors analyze these differences by discussing scope, stakeholders, control, and occupational mobility. These factors provide a framework for examining differences between…
Descriptors: Professional Continuing Education, Training, Outcomes of Education, Cost Effectiveness
Huisman, Jeroen; de Boer, Harry; Goedegebuure, Leo – Tertiary Education and Management, 2006
In 1997 a new governance act, based on the principles of New Public Management (NPM) was introduced at Dutch universities. The aims were to realise integrated management, to strengthen the position of executives at the central (executive board) and faculty (dean) levels, to introduce a Supervisory Board at the institution's central level, and to…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Governance, Laws, Administrative Principles
Meyer, Lynne E. – 1998
The purpose of this qualitative study was to develop a program evaluation template to be used for primary care residencies. Programs were reviewed by meta-evaluation, interviews, and a focus group. Interviews and focus groups were held with four primary care program directors, two medical educators, and one accreditation site surveyor. Survey…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Focus Groups, Graduate Medical Education, Graduate Medical Students