NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 46 to 60 of 257 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aroian, Jane; And Others – Nurse Educator, 1982
The process presented interrelates a positive, systematic plan for evaluation of nursing faculty with an individualized program of personal and professional development. This process makes use of self-, peer, student, and administrative input. (Editor/CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Individual Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Amey, Marilyn J. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Asserts that systematic reform is necessary to allow for an acceptance of and emphasis on outreach performance as an area of faculty work critical to faculty and institutional growth and development. Describes efforts to legitimize and evaluate outreach. (EV)
Descriptors: Citizen Participation, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mills, Michael; Hyle, Adrienne E. – Higher Education, 1999
Explores the faculty evaluation process at Oklahoma State University using a survey and interviews. Finds support for the judgmental aspects of appraisal but a desire for greater focus on faculty development. Suggests that a combined approach to evaluation, while diminishing the focus of both forms, can have positive results both for faculty and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Avery, Rosemary J.; Bryant, W. Keith; Mathios, Alan; Kang, Hyojin; Bell, Duncan – Journal of Economic Education, 2006
An increasing number of academic institutions are considering changing to Web-based systems to take advantage of efficiencies in the collection of end-of-semester course evaluations. In considering such a change it is important that researchers determine whether it will affect mean evaluation scores and response rates. We undertook this study in a…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Internet, Delivery Systems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rice, R. Eugene – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002
Examines Ernest Boyer's 1990 Carnegie report, "Scholarship Reconsidered," as a "tipping point"--a critical turning point in what is fundamentally valued and rewarded in the scholarly work of faculty members. Gives special attention to the scholarship of teaching and the scholarship of engagement. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chang, Yu-bi – Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 2000
A survey of 588 full-time tenure-track faculty indicated that two-thirds were involved in outreach; the quality of outreach activities should be judged by their effectiveness in meeting needs; and multiple measures should be used. Concerns included barriers to outreach participation and determination of what constitutes excellence. (SK)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Outreach Programs
Gelmon, Sherril B.; Lederer, Miriam; Seifer, Sarena D.; Wong, Kristine – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The findings of the evaluation of the three-year Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative are presented, describing changes in institutional capacity for community-engaged scholarship, and changes in promotion and tenure policies and processes. The change process in the participating institutions is assessed using the Kotter model of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, College Faculty, Teacher Role, Educational Principles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ory, John C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
The reliability and validity of student ratings of faculty can be affected by the ethical decisions of those evaluated and evaluating. Systems of faculty evaluation should have their own codes of conduct for students, faculty, and administrators. Nine scenarios offer illustrations. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Ethics, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Selmes, Cyril – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1989
A professor outlines four types of college faculty evaluation (by superiors, by students, by peers, and by outsiders). His attitude toward basic assumptions underlying evaluation is analyzed in terms of values concerning the nature of knowledge, hierarchies, and teaching. Encouraged is evaluation with consultative and open procedures, tangible and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Psychology, Existentialism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
D'Alessandri, Robert M.; Albertsen, Peter; Atkinson, Barbara F.; Dickler, Robert M.; Jones, Robert F.; Kirch, Darrell G.; Longnecker, David E.; McAnarney, Elizabeth R.; Parisi, Valerie M.; Selby, Stephen E.; Stapczynski, J. Stephen; Thompson, Jerome W.; Wasserman, Alan G.; Zuza, Karen L. – Academic Medicine, 2000
Presents the final report of a panel convened by the Association of American Medical College's Mission-based Management Program to examine use of metrics (i.e., measures) in assessing faculty and departmental contributions to clinical mission. Discusses methods of measuring and comparing clinical effort, commonly used metrics, development of…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Measurement, Measurement Techniques, Medical School Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helms, Marilyn M.; Williams, Ashley B.; Nixon, Judy C. – International Journal of Educational Management, 2001
Reviews the history of tenure and post-tenure review, the theory of total quality management (TQM), the role of TQM in higher education, and finally how TQM can be implemented and even supported by tenure and post-tenure programs. Suggests institutional changes so that tenure, post-tenure review, and TQM can work compatibly together. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Tenure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thornton, Saranna – New Directions for Higher Education, 2005
A professor who uses a stop-the-clock policy cannot be certain that his or her total work output will be evaluated as if he or she had a normal probationary period. (Contains 1 table.)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Tenure, Higher Education, Personnel Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nowell, Lucy – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Discusses the tenure evaluation guidelines developed by the United States Institute for Theatre Technology (USITT). Expresses concern over the widening split between theater technologists and the actors, directors, and designers they support. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weimer, Maryellen Gleason; And Others – Studies in Higher Education, 1988
Problems associated with peer observation and evaluation of teaching are examined, and practical ways to compensate for and overcome them in order to achieve the benefits of this form of evaluation are discussed. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, College Faculty, Evaluation Problems, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carusetta, Ellen – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Reviews the literature on teaching awards and then examines a specific case, the Alan P. Stuart Award for Excellence in Teaching at the University of New Brunswick, using Menges's three tests of effective awards. Suggests that examining the strengths and weaknesses of institutional teaching awards can help illuminate the processes involved in…
Descriptors: Awards, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  18