Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 8 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 39 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 87 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
California | 10 |
Australia | 7 |
Canada | 5 |
Colorado | 5 |
District of Columbia | 5 |
Louisiana | 5 |
Minnesota | 4 |
Tennessee | 4 |
United Kingdom | 4 |
United States | 4 |
Florida | 3 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 8 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 4 |
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 2 |
American Recovery and… | 1 |
Goals 2000 | 1 |
Higher Education Act… | 1 |
Race to the Top | 1 |
Workforce Investment Act 1998 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Roshaunda L. Breeden; Christa J. Porter – New Directions for Higher Education, 2024
We begin the last article of this special issue by contextualizing the current landscape of higher education, in 2024. Then, employing a kitchen table dialogue approach, we summarize the diverse articles featured throughout this edition, shedding light on insights that stir both our spirits and intellect. Further, we delve into three key themes…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Journal Articles, Accountability, Educational Responsibility
Rebecchi Kevin; Lubart Todd; Hagège Hélène – Discover Education, 2024
Education today is evolving to foster essential psychosocial skills like creativity, critical thinking, and responsibility, equipping students for 21st-century challenges. However, it is crucial to examine the motivations driving these changes and their alignment with broader societal goals beyond merely economic interests. This article explores…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Creativity, Ethics, Social Responsibility
Ümit Ünsal Kaya – Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2024
This article explores the multifaceted implications of integrating advanced generative AI technologies, specifically ChatGPT, into academic writing and research. It delves into the potential benefits and challenges that arise from the speculative advancements of ChatGPT, emphasizing the dual-edged nature of its capabilities. On one hand, ChatGPT…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Technology Uses in Education, Ethics
Bill Kottenstette; Paola Paga – Colorado Department of Education, 2024
The Innovation Schools Act of 2008, § 22-32.5-102, et seq. C.R.S., was designed to provide a pathway for schools and districts to develop and implement innovative practices in a wide variety of areas and contexts to improve student outcomes. The Act provides a formal process that allows schools or groups of schools to make requests to their local…
Descriptors: Educational Innovation, State Legislation, Educational Legislation, School District Autonomy
Marion, Scott; Domaleski, Chris; Brandt, Chris – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2020
The authors offer a set of recommendations for the next Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) reauthorization. They recommend changes to the assessment, accountability and Innovative Assessment Demonstration Authority (IADA) provisions of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESEA) as well as for a federally-supported research and evaluation…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Assessment
Brauckmann-Sajkiewicz, Stefan; Pashiardis, Petros – International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2022
The relationship between education and organizational financial efficiency can be described as tense and ambiguous. Therefore, issues of educational leadership inspired by models stemming from the business sector are currently hardly dealt with. Consequently, not much attention has been given to findings from the field of Business Financial…
Descriptors: Entrepreneurship, Leadership Styles, Instructional Leadership, Correlation
Mok, Ka Ho; Jiang, Jin – Studies in Higher Education, 2020
Realizing the growing importance of universities in Knowledge Transfer and innovation-centric entrepreneurship, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) actively encourages government-funded universities in Hong Kong to work with the market and industry, as well as wider society to stimulate innovation and…
Descriptors: Governance, Universities, Entrepreneurship, Technology Transfer
Kottenstette, Bill; Paga, Paola – Colorado Department of Education, 2021
The Innovation Schools Act of 2008, § 22-32.5-102, et seq. C.R.S., was designed to provide a pathway for schools and districts to develop and implement innovative practices in a wide variety of areas and contexts to improve student outcomes. The Act provides a formal process that allows schools or groups of schools to make requests to their local…
Descriptors: Educational Innovation, State Legislation, Educational Legislation, School District Autonomy
Groff, Peter – Progressive Policy Institute, 2018
Progressives have long understood that access to a quality education is the one factor that consistently and permanently changes the trajectory of a life. As such, creating a strong public school system has been at the epicenter of our decades-long struggle to promote equal rights and equal opportunity for all. For many of America's families of…
Descriptors: Public Education, Institutional Autonomy, Accountability, School Choice
Hayward, Louise – Teacher Education, Learning Innovation and Accountability, 2018
Internationally, twenty-first century teacher education is enmeshed in a globalized world where the only constants are socio-cultural and economic change. This chapter examines these ideas critically in the context of teacher education policy in Scotland. Although Scotland has not been immune to the influences of the Global Educational Reform…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Teacher Education, Educational Innovation, Accountability
Kottenstette, Bill; Paga, Paola – Colorado Department of Education, 2020
The Innovation Schools Act of 2008, § 22-32.5-102, et seq. C.R.S, was designed to provide a pathway for schools and districts to develop and implement innovative practices in a wide variety of areas and contexts to improve student outcomes. The Act provides a formal process that allows schools or groups of schools to request to their local school…
Descriptors: Educational Innovation, State Legislation, Educational Legislation, School District Autonomy
Kottenstette, Bill; Lanoha, Kady – Colorado Department of Education, 2019
The Innovation Schools Act of 2008, § 22-32.5-102, et seq. C.R.S, was designed to provide a pathway for schools and districts to develop and implement innovative practices in a wide variety of areas to improve student outcomes. The Act provides a formal process that allows schools or groups of schools to petition their local school boards for…
Descriptors: Educational Innovation, State Legislation, Educational Legislation, School District Autonomy
Lee, Chong Jae; Kim, Yong – Asia Pacific Education Review, 2016
For the last 70 years, since the establishment of the Republic of Korea, Korean education has achieved universal expansion of educational opportunity from elementary to secondary to higher education. Planning, centralized policy making, top-down implementation, and administrative control had been the standards of the first few decades of Korean…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Policy, Educational Change, Educational Administration
Adams, Tammie; Aguilar, Elena; Berg, Ellen; Cismowski, Liane; Cody, Anthony; Cohen, David B.; Dean, Sandra; Formigli, Lynn; Fung, Jane; Lee, Cliff; Marshall, Kathie; Skorko, Nancy; White, Silver – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2015
This article addresses the questions, "How should we evaluate the quality of teaching?" and "What kind of evaluation system will move all California teachers on a path of improvement throughout their careers?" The article, adapted from a report written by a group of accomplished California teachers, recommends seven core…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Accountability, Teacher Effectiveness, Standards
O'Keefe, Bonnnie; Lewis, Brandon – Bellwether Education Partners, 2019
Although annual state tests had been federally required since 2001, and the consortia and standards were led by states, the new tests became a focal point of narratives about federal overreach and over-testing. Current wisdom holds that testing has become politically toxic. There are real risks that some states are rolling back advancements in…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Student Evaluation, Common Core State Standards, Accountability