Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Acceleration (Education) | 1 |
| Age | 1 |
| College Attendance | 1 |
| Gender Issues | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Intelligence Quotient | 1 |
| Literature Reviews | 1 |
| Maturity (Individuals) | 1 |
| Parent Participation | 1 |
| Physical Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCulross, Rita R.; Jolly, Jennifer L.; Winkler, Daniel – Roeper Review, 2013
This article revisits the 1986 Feldhusen, Proctor, and Black recommendations on grade skipping. These recommendations originally appeared as 12 guidelines. In this article, the guidelines are grouped into three general categories: how to screen accelerant candidates, how to engage with the adults in the acceleration process (e.g., teachers,…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Acceleration (Education), School Entrance Age, College Attendance
