Descriptor
Reference Services | 4 |
Library Services | 3 |
College Libraries | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Library Surveys | 2 |
Tables (Data) | 2 |
User Satisfaction… | 2 |
Access to Information | 1 |
Cataloging | 1 |
Check Lists | 1 |
Costs | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
RQ | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Media Staff | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Sinkule, Karen – RQ, 1986
Deals with the difficulties that arise in overcoming the physical and bibliographic problems of microform government publications. Areas discussed include accessing documents, arranging collections, and type of physical facilities and equipment needed. Practical suggestions for promoting use of microforms documents are given. (Author/EM)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Cataloging, Depository Libraries, Government Publications

Clark, Philip M.; Benson, James – RQ, 1985
Proposes and investigates feasibility of using three new variables in addition to simple activity counts in measuring reference services: (1) user questioning regardless of where activity occurs; (2) treating individual user and question as unit of analysis; and (3) examination of questioning in context of other library use. (11 references) (EJS)
Descriptors: Females, Library Circulation, Library Services, Library Surveys

Brownmiller, Sara; And Others – RQ, 1985
Use of online bibliographic databases as ready-reference sources was evaluated in five-month study at three reference areas in University of Arizona Library. Equipment and training requirements were analyzed, and statistics were collected on databases searched, costs per search, question type, and patron and staff reactions. Ready-reference…
Descriptors: College Libraries, Costs, Databases, Feasibility Studies

Kleiner, Jane P. – RQ, 1991
Discussion of performance appraisal and evaluation focuses on a peer review and evaluation process of reference services that was developed at Louisiana State University. Formative evaluation principles are discussed, user survey results are reported, and a checklist for implementing a peer desk review process is provided. (20 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Check Lists, College Libraries, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education