NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)7
Source
NASSP Bulletin160
Assessments and Surveys
Organizational Climate…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 160 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fallon, Paul D. – NASSP Bulletin, 2013
Although inextricable, the act of leading, the leader, and outcome of leadership are unique entities. Lack of such differentiation may ensnare novice leaders in broad suppositions. This conceptual article introduces a tool for analyzing leadership. Leaders can leverage the model to evaluate the act of leading, in route, via a measurable trajectory…
Descriptors: Leadership, Leadership Effectiveness, Leadership Qualities, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pugh, Philip M.; Tschannen-Moran, Megan – NASSP Bulletin, 2016
This article examines a school district's Advancement via Individual Determination (AVID) program using perceived self-efficacy in academic achievement and self-regulated learning, GPA and attendance as indicators of program effectiveness. Results suggest that AVID participation was positively and significantly correlated with attendance in the…
Descriptors: School Districts, Academic Achievement, Self Determination, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Woodland, Rebecca H.; Mazur, Rebecca – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Educational evaluation (Ed Eval) and professional learning communities (PLCs) are two of the nation's most predominant approaches to widespread instructional improvement. Yet key attributes of these reform initiatives are too often experienced by teachers as burdensome, or even detrimental, rather than helpful. The authors of this article contend…
Descriptors: Integrated Curriculum, Faculty Development, Communities of Practice, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katsiyannis, Antonis; Losinski, Mickey; Prince, Angela M. T. – NASSP Bulletin, 2012
Special education litigation remains a volatile area with significant practice implications. A review of the 2010 case law in the "Special Educator" identified discipline (manifestation determination, seclusion and restraints, harassment), evaluation/RTI, and postsecondary transition as specific areas of concern. School administrators should keep…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Court Litigation, Special Education Teachers, Special Needs Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reedy, Randy – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
If evaluation is to communicate and promote student learning, it must be separated into formative and summative components. A grading policy that provides nonthreatening feedback (via observation of student work, group evaluation activities, classroom participation, homework, reports, discussions, and portfolios) can help students concentrate on…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Grading, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gorton, Richard; Ohlemacher, Roger – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
A Wisconsin study reveals that most school counselors are evaluated at least annually but that inappropriate evaluation criteria are applied. Recommendations include developing a clear policy, establishing a task force (composed of administrators, counselors, and others) to review existing criteria and procedures, and implementing any new plan on…
Descriptors: Counselor Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fontana, Jean – NASSP Bulletin, 1994
Annual summative evaluation rarely brings about professional growth or change; ongoing formative evaluation that allows for corrections and encourages development of new skills and talents is more effective. Data alone are not enough. Principals' needs must be linked to the resources of people, materials, funds, and enriched staff development…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Studer, Jeannine R.; Sommers, Judith A. – NASSP Bulletin, 2000
Too often school counselors are evaluated through a teacher-assessment process bearing little relevance to (poorly defined) counseling tasks or roles. Evaluation is hindered by lack of a developmental model and by administrative pressures to perform tasks outside counselors' training and experience. Improvement measures are outlined. (Contains 16…
Descriptors: Accountability, Counselor Evaluation, Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rammer, Robert A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
A recent literature review and field survey on administrator evaluation disclosed disappointing results. There is uniform agreement that building administrator evaluations should be conducted by the superintendent and that general behavior categories might be examined. The literature is silent regarding definitive format. Researchers and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katims, David S.; Henderson, Richard L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
Standardized teacher appraisal instruments are generally not designed to evaluate the specialized instructional practices of teachers working with exceptional students. By incorporating the model described in this article, teacher evaluators can use their state-mandated system and meet these teachers' need for equitable consideration. Includes 10…
Descriptors: Accountability, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Job Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dagley, David L.; Orso, J. Kenneth – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
Offers a teacher evaluation model designed to help principals understand their role as instructional supervisor. The model can also help teachers understand the nature of the evaluation being accomplished, facilitate the delegation of formative evaluation to others, and reconcile two seemingly irreconcilable processes. (12 references) (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smyth, W. John – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
The principal has a duty to assess the worth (make a summative evaluation) of the various parts of the organization, including teachers, and the further responsibility for making provision for the formative evaluation of the teaching staff with a view to assisting them in their personal and professional growth. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Bureaucracy, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kimball, Roland B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
A typology of evaluation techniques intended to help school personnel to compare and contrast various approaches. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Classification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Boyle, J. David – NASSP Bulletin, 1992
Evaluation of secondary school music programs should not be based on performing groups' success. The Music Educators National Conference has suggested that a comprehensive evaluation should examine several aspects of a school music program, including goals and objectives, leadership, staffing, curriculum and scheduling, instructional materials,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Music Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Peterson, Donovan; Peterson, Kathryn – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
In a research-based approach, the responsibilities involved in teacher evaluation, including unclear and conflicting areas, are reviewed. The author provides a set of six guidelines to consider when developing evaluation systems. (MD)
Descriptors: Due Process, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Peer Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11