Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Education Economics | 1 |
Education and Urban Society | 1 |
Educational Studies in Japan:… | 1 |
European Education | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Kappa Delta Pi Record | 1 |
OECD Publishing (NJ1) | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
Journal Articles | 6 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Japan | 7 |
United States | 5 |
Canada | 3 |
Finland | 3 |
Singapore | 3 |
South Korea | 3 |
Australia | 2 |
Belgium | 2 |
Czech Republic | 2 |
Germany | 2 |
Hong Kong | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 3 |
Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Niazov, Anya – Education and Urban Society, 2020
Despite ongoing reform efforts, academic achievement in the U.S. educational system is declining both on internal measures as well as on international comparative assessments. While students from affluent backgrounds continue to do well academically, there is a growing achievement gap as underprivileged urban students fall further behind. This…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Educational Change, Achievement Gap, School Effectiveness
Ninomiya, Shuichi – Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 2016
Black and Wiliam (1998a, 1998b) demonstrate that formative assessment is one of the most effective strategies for promoting student learning. Since the publication of their reviews, formative assessment has gained increasing international prominence in both policy and practice. However, despite this early innovation, the theory and practice of…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Achievement Gap, Theory Practice Relationship, Accountability
OECD Publishing (NJ1), 2012
Countless policy makers and researchers have flocked to observe the education systems of Hong Kong, Shanghai and Singapore, which are among the top five performers in the PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) 2009 reading assessment. Many visitors have been particularly impressed by the fact that these education systems succeed in…
Descriptors: Urban Areas, Urban Education, Academic Achievement, Socioeconomic Status
Olwell, Russ – Kappa Delta Pi Record, 2011
Based on his own teaching experiences and findings, the author discusses the experience gap between U.S. and Japanese students' knowledge of World War II. He compares and contrasts how the subject of World War II is taught in the United States versus Japan. While it takes teacher effort to enrich the history experiences of U.S. students, the…
Descriptors: War, Foreign Countries, Knowledge Level, Familiarity
Baird, Katherine – Education Economics, 2012
This paper investigates achievement gaps between low and high socioeconomic students in 19 high-income countries. On average, math scores of students with indicators of high socioeconomic status (SES) are over one standard deviation above those with low SES indicators. The paper estimates the extent to which these achievement gaps can be…
Descriptors: Mathematics Achievement, Achievement Gap, Socioeconomic Status, Educational Resources
What PISA Tells Us about the Quality and Inequality of Japanese Education in Mathematics and Science
Knipprath, Heidi – International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2010
Researchers, policy officials, and the wider public in Japan and abroad often hold different views about the quality of Japanese education. Whereas Western researchers are attracted by the academic performance of Japanese students in international assessment studies, Japanese university professors launched a public debate in 1999 about declining…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Program Effectiveness, Foreign Countries, Educational Opportunities
Perry, Laura – European Education, 2009
This article examines equity in national systems of education in terms of differences in student outcomes, as measured by mathematics achievement scores on Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003. The author uses four measures for assessing equity in student outcomes: (1) the strength of the relationship between student…
Descriptors: Privatization, Equal Education, School Choice, Mathematics Achievement