Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Sentence Structure | 3 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Pretests Posttests | 2 |
Reading Fluency | 2 |
Teaching Methods | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Attention Control | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Error Patterns | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Generalization | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Gross, Paul R. | 1 |
LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille | 1 |
Macaruso, Paul | 1 |
Martens, Brian K. | 1 |
Shankweiler, Donald | 1 |
Silber, Jennifer M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 1 | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 12 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Silber, Jennifer M.; Martens, Brian K. – Journal of Behavioral Education, 2010
This study compared a multiple exemplar approach involving the training of key words and sentence structures to a typical repeated readings procedure for their effects on students' generalized oral reading fluency. The two training approaches were also compared in terms of their relative learning rates (i.e., fluency gain per minute of instruction…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Research Design, Reading Fluency, Attention Control
LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille; Macaruso, Paul; Shankweiler, Donald – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2008
On the ground that reading fluency entails appropriate phrasing or prosody as well as facile word recognition, we investigated the effectiveness of text-based and word-based repeated readings procedures for promoting fluency of reading aloud and comprehension in second-grade children. Repeated readings of text printed with spaces between phrases…
Descriptors: Reading Fluency, Sentence Structure, Word Lists, Word Recognition
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction