Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 12 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 55 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 63 |
Postsecondary Education | 34 |
Two Year Colleges | 3 |
Adult Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 60 |
Administrators | 44 |
Teachers | 21 |
Policymakers | 6 |
Researchers | 4 |
Counselors | 1 |
Location
Australia | 5 |
California | 5 |
United Kingdom | 5 |
Germany | 4 |
Canada | 3 |
Finland | 3 |
Spain | 3 |
United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 3 |
Arizona | 2 |
China | 2 |
Iowa | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
Equal Pay Act 1963 | 1 |
Higher Education Act Title II | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
North American Free Trade… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Horine, Larry – Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 1981
Due to budgetary restraints, two major tasks confronting the physical education profession are: (1) to increase the overall productivity of the staff; and (2) to identify and weed out nonproductive faculty. An evaluative instrument is presented which measures nonteaching performance in a university department. (JN)
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Hudson, Walter W. – Journal of Education for Social Work, 1981
A system that helps students monitor their progress by providing regular feedback and producing a learning curve for each student as well as the whole class is described. The system is also designed to help faculty evaluate their own teaching performance. (MSE)
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Criterion Referenced Tests, Faculty Evaluation, Feedback

Walker, Noojin – Community/Junior College Research Quarterly, 1979
Describes an evaluation/promotion system developed at Pensacola Junior College whereby an anonymous faculty committee would independently evaluate each candidate's promotion documentation. After six years, very little agreement was found among the committee's evaluations. Evaluators worked from their own unique sets of criteria of effectiveness.…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Tierney, William G. – Academe, 1997
Discusses the need for post-tenure faculty review to root out "dead wood" faculty and increase faculty accountability, focusing on the time frame for such reviews, who gets reviewed, and the intensity and ramifications of the review. Also notes criticisms of post-tenure reviews and the need to build community through self-regulation.…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Community, Competence

Jacobs, Keith W. – Teaching of Psychology, 1989
Suggests a procedure for the evaluation of the department chairperson. Emphasizes the benefits and importance of such evaluations. Claims minimal attention has been given to such evaluations and offers suggestions. Provides a list of 19 evaluation items used. (Author/NL)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Department Heads, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Cannon, Robert – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Examines the evaluation of teaching in entire programs, departments, and institutions. Discusses the varying levels of evaluation and their corresponding methodologies, asserting that these indicate the broadening context in which the evaluation of teaching is now taking place. (EV)
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

McLean, S. Vianne; Callarman, Thomas E. – Innovative Higher Education, 1999
Describes the development and implementation of the Arizona post-tenure review policy, with particular emphasis on the Arizona State University experience. This policy had to balance the different expectations of the Arizona Board of Regents, the faculty, and university administration. Outlines communication strategies used in negotiations with…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Faculty, Cooperation, Faculty Evaluation
Kurz, Lisa; Banta, Trudy W. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004
This chapter outlines the understanding gained when working with faculty to learn about assessment, to develop a plan, and to support them as they carry out and interpret their assessments. (Contains 1 table and 1 exhibit.)
Descriptors: Exhibits, Faculty Development, Intellectual Disciplines, Comparative Analysis
King, Margaret L. – Academic Questions, 2003
For too strictly judging job applicants on their academic merits, an outstanding Brooklyn College history professor incurred administrative wrath that--in a vicious campaign of innuendo and slander couched in allegations of "uncollegiality"--almost sank his career. Margaret King chronicles how an alliance of those interested in scholarly…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Teacher Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Tenure
Franck, Egon; Opitz, Christian – Comparative Education Review, 2006
The international competitiveness of national higher education systems is an important political issue in many countries. These politics drive some governments to reform their systems by borrowing elements from societies with systems thought to be superior. These authors argue that a simple transfer of isolated elements from one higher education…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Rewards, Federal Aid, Educational Change
Johnson, William L.; Johnson, Annabel M. – 1990
A description is provided of the process used in developing a brief summative-evaluation instrument that was created for use at a large university in the Southwestern United States in its attempt to be more responsive to the changing climate of assessment and accountability that universities are facing today. Beginning with a conceptual systemic…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Licata, Christine M. – Innovation Abstracts, 1984
A study was conducted to investigate the current status of post-tenure faculty evaluation in the community college. Questionnaires were mailed to 1,290 tenured and non-tenured faculty and 421 administrators at 9 community colleges. Study findings, based on a 50.1% response rate, included the following: (1) 77% of the respondents indicated that…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Boggs, George – 1984
Designed to encourage college administrators to place greater priority on faculty evaluation, this report provides an overview of the processes and outcomes of faculty evaluation and examines its relationship to faculty development and instructional improvement. Introductory comments recognize the lack of emphasis generally placed on faculty…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty College Relationship
Heller, Scott – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1986
The Supreme Court decision to let stand a lower-court ruling that allows a government agency to inspect confidential documents in a faculty tenure case is discussed. An appeal by Franklin and Marshall College on a decision granting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission access to tenure materials was declined. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Confidential Records, Confidentiality, Court Litigation
Stine, Deborah E.; Hill, Jim – 2002
This paper examines the current status of standards and assessment in California, focusing on the system's successes and failures, and on how professors of educational administration can be involved and of assistance to administrators and teachers in this endeavor. At this time, the California accountability system and other mandated factors have…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Effectiveness, Administrators, Educational Administration