NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 76 to 90 of 438 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saroyan, Alenoush; Amundsen, Cheryl – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2001
Asserts that in order for teaching evaluation to encourage improvement, there must be a measure of all elements that make teaching what it is. Proposes a model that highlights the significance of conceptions, knowledge, and the context within which the instructional event takes place. Suggests activities and instruments that may assess teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hammons, James O.; Gansz, Joey L. – Community College Journal, 2005
In the corporate world, more and more companies have begun to use a more effective method of evaluating prospective employees. It is estimated that by 1996, approximately 20 to 30 percent of the nation's large companies had begun to use this more effective method known as behavioral-based interviewing (BI). This article explains what BI is and…
Descriptors: Employment Interviews, Teacher Selection, Job Analysis, Faculty Evaluation
Jordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides
Freeman, Elmer; Gust, Susan; Aloshen, Deborah – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
Communities across our nation--whether geographic, ethnic, or issue-based in their composition--are struggling to be healthy, to grow, and thrive. The production of knowledge and the sharing of knowledge by both the community and the higher education institution is the key to helping our communities improve. Retaining and valuing community-engaged…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Faculty Promotion, Tenure, Partnerships in Education
Dottin, Erskine S. – 1987
The basic evaluation model for faculty is one in which quantitative information about the means of teaching, research, and service are tied to salary increases. However, faculty evaluation in this context is usually trapped conceptually between questions of fairness and questions of evaluation. Means and ends are distorted. On the other hand, if…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, College Faculty, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lawrence, Janet H. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1988
Traditional ideas about improving teaching should be augmented by new understandings of faculty self-perception and motivation. At the National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, professors have been interviewed to determine if faculty hold beliefs about an institution that influence their behavior. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koehler, W. F. – Research in Higher Education, 1986
A salary-growth model is described that includes the nature of the salary dependence on experience for various levels of performance of faculty members in a subset having the same level of education and the same marketability of their specialities. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edwards, Richard – Academe, 1997
Discusses the use of post-tenure review to help preserve the tenure system at colleges and universities, focusing on the use of such reviews to encourage faculty development and productivity, ensure faculty control over the review system, and help marginal faculty improve their performance. (MDM)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Competence, Faculty Development
Lederman, Douglas – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1995
The debate over opening Ohio public college and university faculty tenure and promotion documents to the public, mandated by the state supreme court, is examined with reference to specific cases and decisions. Concerns are for the integrity of the faculty evaluation process and the maintenance of academic values. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Confidential Records, Disclosure, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Quilter, Shawn; Weber, Roberta K. – International Journal on E-Learning, 2004
Skeptics may be quick to question the quality of teaching and learning in the online environment. Thus, to answer questions about quality of instruction, it is essential to find ways to identify and illustrate best practice for teaching and learning that takes place in eLearning environments. Within the context of this article and the belief of…
Descriptors: Quality Control, Online Courses, Faculty Evaluation, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldman, Phillip – Education, 2005
While there are many factors that affect the quality of teacher education programs, one specific related factor, a culture of accountability, will be addressed in this reflection of Haberman's work. A systematic review of faculty performance with specific rubrics and increasing expectation based on earned faculty rank is a necessary step in…
Descriptors: Teacher Education Programs, Faculty Evaluation, Accountability, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fries, Christopher J.; McNinch, R. James – Teaching Sociology, 2003
Argues research lacks consideration of the value and impact involving signed and unsigned instructor evaluation responses from students. Describes a midwestern Canadian study of the subject. Finds signing protocol leads to higher instructor scores and that female instructors scored higher than male counterparts. (KDR)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Females
Romberg, Elaine – 1985
Despite the movement in dentistry toward a system of professional peer review, dental educators appear highly resistant to evaluation by their colleagues. The University of Maryland Dental School has a comprehensive evaluation system involving evaluation of courses and instruction by students, program evaluations by individual departments, formal…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Dental Schools, Departments, Evaluation Methods
Cudney, Shirley A. – Nursing Health Care, 1985
Describes a faculty evaluation model that integrates ingredients of personal development, such as self-satisfaction, growth, and improvement, with such rewards as merit pay, wage increases, promotions, and tenure. Discusses criteria; guidelines for their use; the standards for tenure, promotion, and appointment; and the annual review process. (CT)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines, Individual Development, Models
Oregon Univ. System, Eugene. Office of Academic Affairs. – 1999
This report examines post-tenure review for college faculty and reviews initiatives to strengthen post-tenure review at Oregon University System (OUS) institutions. It defines post-tenure review and discusses the issues involved in implementing such policies. The report addresses the components of the post-tenure review process, including…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Policy, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  30