Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 14 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 116 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 308 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 850 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Baum, Sandy | 9 |
Supiano, Beckie | 7 |
Blumenstyk, Goldie | 6 |
Crandall-Hollick, Margot L. | 6 |
Fletcher, Carla | 6 |
Pingel, Sarah | 5 |
Voight, Mamie | 5 |
Burd, Stephen | 4 |
Choy, Susan P. | 4 |
Field, Kelly | 4 |
Harney, John O. | 4 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 289 |
Community | 206 |
Practitioners | 25 |
Administrators | 24 |
Students | 20 |
Counselors | 11 |
Researchers | 8 |
Parents | 7 |
Support Staff | 2 |
Teachers | 2 |
Location
California | 72 |
United States | 44 |
Washington | 38 |
Texas | 31 |
Arizona | 25 |
Colorado | 22 |
Michigan | 22 |
Ohio | 22 |
Virginia | 22 |
Indiana | 20 |
Oregon | 20 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 1 |
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2008
The purpose of a state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information to assess and improve post secondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2008" is the fifth in a series of biennial report cards that evaluates states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation for post-secondary education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Access to Education
Devlin, Marcia; James, Richard; Grigg, Gabrielle – Tertiary Education and Management, 2008
A key determinant of the new relationship between students and universities in Australia is the changing nature of higher education funding arrangements and the shift towards "user-pays". In 2007, the Centre for the Study of Higher Education (CSHE) completed a commissioned national study, "Australian University Student Finances…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Foreign Countries, Learner Engagement
Sanoff, Alvin P.; Powell, David S. – 2003
Tens of thousands of students, especially those from low-income and minority groups, are unprepared academically for higher education, come from backgrounds in which college aspirations are not the norm, or lack the information they need to gain access. In addition, there is a growing difference in the rate at which students from different income…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Economically Disadvantaged, Educationally Disadvantaged

California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento. – 2001
This factsheet describes undergraduate student charges at the public universities of California. California charges its own residents less to attend its public colleges and universities than it charges nonresidents. It charges resident students systemwide fees as well as mandatory, campus-based fees to help support student services, but California…
Descriptors: Economic Factors, Fees, Higher Education, In State Students
O'Toole, Chuck – Connection: The Journal of the New England Board of Higher Education, 2003
Describes the Department of Education's 2003 proposed revision of the Expected Family Contribution formula, which determines family eligibility for federal financial aid. In many cases, it will mean that parents requesting aid for September 2004 will appear to have higher after-tax incomes than they did the year before. Such changes would cut…
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Federal Aid, Federal Legislation, Higher Education

Bannon, Ellynne; King, Tracey – Student Aid Transcript, 2002
This article analyzes "skyrocketing" student debt levels, discussing debt burden, borrowing trends among student subpopulations, and why debt is increasing. It asserts that to reverse these trends, particularly among low-income and minority families, Congress must increase grant aid, lower the cost of borrowing to students, and make repayment less…
Descriptors: Debt (Financial), Higher Education, Loan Repayment, Low Income Groups
Gose, Ben – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1995
Most private colleges are slowing down their tuition increases for fall 1995 to 4-5%. Most public colleges have not yet set tuition. In some cases, student financial aid is being apportioned less generously to raise the student self-help level. Most tuition increases reflect cost of institutional investments in technology. (MSE)
Descriptors: Economic Change, Higher Education, Paying for College, Private Colleges
Healy, Patrick – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1995
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will not ask the Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision to exempt the Michigan Education Trust from federal income taxes. The state college tuition prepayment plan was discontinued in 1991 due to legal challenges but promised to honor its commitments to 55,000 participants. The program may now be…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Federal Government, Federal Regulation, Higher Education