Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 12 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 55 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 63 |
Postsecondary Education | 34 |
Two Year Colleges | 3 |
Adult Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 60 |
Administrators | 44 |
Teachers | 21 |
Policymakers | 6 |
Researchers | 4 |
Counselors | 1 |
Location
Australia | 5 |
California | 5 |
United Kingdom | 5 |
Germany | 4 |
Canada | 3 |
Finland | 3 |
Spain | 3 |
United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 3 |
Arizona | 2 |
China | 2 |
Iowa | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
Equal Pay Act 1963 | 1 |
Higher Education Act Title II | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
North American Free Trade… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Mitcham, Maralynne – Journal of Allied Health, 1981
The issues of faculty performance evaluation for allied health professionals are addressed. Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP (content-imput-process-product) model is introduced and its development into a CIPP-SAPS (self-administrative-peer- student) model is pursued. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Allied Health Personnel, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Hellweg, Susan A.; Churchman, David A. – Planning for Higher Education, 1981
A model for minimizing or eradicating the weaknesses of the tenure system is offered. The model is designed to be responsive to the needs of higher education, specifically in providing for academic accountability. The system proposed makes decisions about pay, rank, and tenure independent of one another. (MLW)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Hanna, Donald E. – New Directions for Continuing Education, 1981
Posits that faculty members avoid participation in continuing education because their involvement is scarcely considered in decisions regarding salary, tenure, and promotion. (JOW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Continuing Education, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion

Dooris, Michael J. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
Suggests that targeted, action-oriented institutional research can help a college or university better understand and more effectively use faculty resources. Profiles a multi-campus research university whose institutional research portfolio has emphasized faculty issues. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Institutional Research

Rosenfeld, Lawrence B.; Long, Beverly Whitaker – ACA Bulletin, 1992
Describes a microevaluation approach to faculty assessment written for a department with 15 faculty engaged in both traditional scholarship and creative activities in a research-oriented university. Presents the assessment instrument. (SR)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Merit Pay

Switkes, Ellen – Innovative Higher Education, 1999
Describes the well-established pre- and post-tenure evaluation of faculty at the University of California. All faculty are reviewed every two to four years by department colleagues, the dean, and a campus faculty committee. Although the process poses a substantial workload, faculty and administrators regard it as crucial to maintaining a…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Merit Rating
Wilson, Robin – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2001
Describes how Peter Berkowitz, well known for his caustic political commentary, sued Harvard after it denied his tenure bid. As the first professor ever to take the institution to court for such a denial, Berkowitz has incurred disdain; supporters say he simply follows through on what he believes and expects others to do so. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation
Felder, Richard M. – Engineering Education, 1984
Discusses eight steps to modify the way engineering schools operate. They include hiring some experienced engineers as faculty, incorporating peer and student review of teaching performance in faculty evaluations, reversing the tendency to make curricula increasingly narrow and specialized, and adopting a systems approach to engineering education.…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Improvement, Engineering Education, Faculty Evaluation
New England Resource Center for Higher Education, 2001
Within any college and university, it is in the academic department where most of the work is accomplished in educating students and carrying out the institution's academic mission. Department chairs are at the front lines of policy implementation. At a recent meeting members of [New England Resource Center for Higher Education's] NERCHE's…
Descriptors: Tenure, Job Performance, Personnel Policy, Department Heads

Brooks, David W. – Journal of Chemical Education, 1980
Explores various aspects of the formula approach to faculty evaluation. Variables are explained and a sample formula is offered. (CS)
Descriptors: Chemistry, College Faculty, College Science, Evaluation Methods

Roworth, Wendy Wassyng – Academe, 1997
Provides a case study of the use of departmental peer review at the University of Rhode Island, focusing on the differing attitudes toward the peer review process held by tenured and untenured faculty, the apprehension of women and minority faculty toward the process, and the "ratcheting up" of the research and publication requirements…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation

Diamond, Robert M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002
Discusses influences on the definition of scholarship (such as discipline, priorities of the institution and academic unit, and interests of the individual), traces recent developments in how the scholarly role of faculty members is viewed, and recommends an institutional approach for bringing fairness and quality into faculty reward systems. (EV)
Descriptors: Change, College Faculty, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Grossman, Jack H. – Performance and Instruction, 1991
Discussion of criteria for hiring and the development of university teachers focuses on the development of an instrument for students to evaluate teachers' effectiveness. A copy of the instructor evaluation form developed at DePaul University (Chicago) is included, and suggestions for a program to improve teaching are offered. (LRW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Fenwick, Tara J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Discusses the often difficult process of evaluating teaching effectiveness in terms of student learning outcomes. Suggests approaches for micro- and macro-level teacher evaluation using student outcomes. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Miller, Margaret A. – Innovative Higher Education, 1999
Provides an overview of state-level college faculty post-tenure review policies, describes their features, and speculates about the future of post-tenure review. Notes statements of Virginia's 1994 Commission on the Future of Higher Education that criticize the tenure tradition and Virginia state legislation requiring greater accountability by…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Personnel Policy