NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 151 to 165 of 438 results Save | Export
Becker, Elaine; Schaffner, Johanna – 1999
This paper describes the structured faculty mentoring program at the Pittsburgh Technical Institute (Pennsylvania), which is designed to provide a system of support for new faculty, who encounter many stressful situations on a daily basis, and provide guidance and encouragement. One of the primary goals of the program is to improve the quality of…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abplanalp, Paul H.; Baldwin, William R. – Journal of Optometric Education, 1983
The status of faculty evaluation in optometric education and techniques contributing significantly to teaching quality are reviewed. Institutions are encouraged to provide incentives for faculty development with a favorable organizational climate and time. (MSE)
Descriptors: Allied Health Occupations Education, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Poole, Lawrence H.; Dellow, Donald A. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1983
Describes the multiple-data-based, full-time faculty evaluation system at North Country Community College, which assesses classroom and advisement effectiveness, professional development, and college and governance activities. Includes samples of various instructor evaluation forms. Defines the rating terms used. Discusses reappointment, tenure,…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathias, Haydn; Rutherford, Desmond – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1981
The Course Evaluation Scheme involved staff members from a variety of departments in the evaluation of one another's courses. Peer evaluation, as opposed to evaluation by senior colleagues, students or educational consultants, makes this scheme potentially most acceptable to staff for assessing university teaching. (CE)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Salmon, Daniel A.; Wolf, Susan E. – Clearing House, 1982
Traces the development of the performance appraisal program of the Hicksville, New York, public school system, which was designed to improve instructional programs. Describes the strong opposition the program received from teachers. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Breslin, Richard D.; Klagholz, Leo F. – Educational Record, 1980
Faculty members at New Jersey's state colleges have begun working under a plan that provides salary increases for meritorious performance. Such merit compensation does not conflict with faculty promotion, nor is it intended to replace cost-of-living increases. However, it does replace government-style guaranteed automatic raises that encourage…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guang-Wei, Wu – Education for Information, 1989
Briefly reviews the development of Chinese library schools and describes the management and evaluation of library school faculty. The discussion covers problems with the current system and suggestions for improvements. A directory of departments of library and information science in China is included. (21 references) (CLB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Developing Nations, Educational Administration, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ben-Zadok, Efraim; Carter, Rosalyn Y. – Higher Education Management, 1998
The State University System of Florida's Teaching Incentive Program remains an undergraduate and quantity-based program, having changed only slightly to accommodate graduate and quality interests. Discussion of the program highlights issues of undergraduate vs. graduate and quantity vs. quality in faculty evaluation, and illustrates that numbers…
Descriptors: Awards, College Administration, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis
Appling, Susan E.; Naumann, Phyllis L.; Berk, Ronald A. – Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, 2001
Describes a system to evaluate evidence-based nursing teaching that uses three sources: student evaluation of teacher, teaching portfolios, and peer evaluation. The system also includes mentoring and administrative structure for using the data for pay and promotion. (Contains 29 references.) (SK)
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Nursing Education
Tracy, Dyanne M.; Muir, Sharon Pray – 1992
A faculty-developed, criterion-based merit pay plan is described in this paper. Participation among department members is voluntary, and peers allocate merit pay based on pre-established criteria. The plan includes three categories of expectations--teaching, scholarship, and service--which are evaluated at two performance levels--strong and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Ramos-Cancel, Maria L.; Duttweiler, Patricia Cloud, Ed. – 1986
The papers in this collection are based on the document "Perspectives on Performance-Based Incentive Plans" and offer brief overviews of the following issues in education: (1) performance-based evaluation in relation to incentive pay plans; (2) recommendations for success of performance-based evaluation systems; (3) the use of classroom…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classroom Observation Techniques, Elementary Secondary Education, Faculty Evaluation
Lieberman, Myron – Newsletter of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, 1986
The view that peer review and faculty self-government are detrimental is expressed. Peer review, a procedure in which the conduct of faculty members is subject to review by other faculty members, is used primarily in personnel and research decisions (e.g., tenure, promotion, and/or salary increases, and to assess grant or contract proposals).…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Decision Making, Faculty Evaluation
Wisgoski, Alfred; Andrews, Hans A. – 1986
Two of the essential ingredients of institutional quality are the recruitment of quality staff and the systematic evaluation of all staff. To be effective, evaluation must be supported by the governing board, must be conducted by competent administrators with histories as superior teachers, and must be based on clearly defined personnel policies…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods
Romanik, Dale – 1986
This booklet describes the four major components of the staff evaluation plan currently practiced at the Mitchell Wolfson New World Center Campus of Miami-Dade Community College. First, introductory material indicates that the essential elements of the plan include a concern for staff development, improvement, and accountability, as well as the…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Seldin, Peter – Peabody Journal of Education, 1982
In the past, faculty evaluation programs have been more often prone to failure than success. Characteristics of a successful program include: (1) deciding the system's purpose; (2) seeking solid administrative support; (3) securing faculty involvement; (4) overcoming faculty resistance; (5) selecting the evaluation instruments; and (6) obtaining…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Trends, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  ...  |  30