NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 136 to 150 of 438 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McFadden, Susan H.; Perlman, Baron – Teaching of Psychology, 1989
Argues recruitment of faculty to provide high-quality undergraduate teaching requires both departmental examination and careful observation of candidates. Provides a conceptual framework describing desirable characteristics. Examines the intellectual, emotional, and moral dimensions of teaching that assist in conducting the faculty search.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Collegiality, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Recruitment
Magner, Denise K. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1995
Increasingly, colleges and universities are instituting periodic evaluations of tenured faculty with the objective of encouraging faculty development. Some faculty question the need for posttenure review. Supporters feel the trend may strengthen tenure by providing evidence in its defense. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Trends, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wenger, Robert B.; Girard, Dennis M. – Research in Higher Education, 2000
Presents a merit pay allocation model based on the principle of awarding comparable percentage salary increases to college/university faculty members with similar merit ratings. The model enables users to calculate merit pay amounts for individual faculty members in a systematic and efficient manner and can incorporate various policy directives…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sorcinelli, Mary Deane; Davis, Barbara Gross – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996
A discussion of reward programs to recognize effective teaching looks first at the nature of existing award systems, and outlines key considerations in development of the awards, including aspects of teaching to be honored, evidence on which selections are based, and selection processes. Suggestions made by several award recipients on how to…
Descriptors: Awards, College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Knapper, Christopher – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Discusses underlying issues that affect all forms of teaching evaluation: determining criteria, making links between teaching methods and learning outcomes, and distinguishing between evaluation for self-improvement and evaluation for accountability. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Knapper, Christopher; Wright, W. Alan – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Describes the history, goals, and applications of the teaching portfolio as an alternative teaching assessment. (EV)
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Theall, Michael; Franklin, Jennifer – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Examines the role of technology in teaching evaluation, discussing the need to incorporate the principles of good evaluation practice as evaluation systems become increasingly automated. Suggests applications of technology that hold promise for improving evaluation practice, such as teacher-course evaluation systems. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Uses in Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cahn, Steven M. – Academe, 2004
Most college and university administrators claim to care deeply about the quality of teaching at their institutions. But, too often, their actions belie their words. Consider, for example, the following questions. Which candidate for a faculty position is usually viewed as more attractive, the promising researcher or the promising teacher? Who…
Descriptors: Researchers, College Faculty, Personnel Selection, Teacher Salaries
McKinnon, Norma; And Others – 1993
Atlantic Baptist College (New Brunswick, Canada) has adopted a faculty evaluation program based on the work of a committee of administrators and faculty representatives. The program was initiated out of the administration's desire to foster academic excellence and faculty development through a more systematic evaluation procedure. The committee…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Tinari, Frank D. – 1994
The W. Paul Stillman School of Business at Seton Hall University has implemented a model standardized annual Faculty Development Plan (FDP). A form was developed to collect data from each faculty member. The form is divided into the areas of teaching, research, and service, with several questions in each area asking faculty to specify their goals…
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, College Faculty, Educational Planning, Faculty Development
Dixson, Marcia D. – 1994
This paper presents a chronological guide (from hiring to evaluating) in directing associate faculty in communication studies. The paper reviews the small amount of research and advice published in this area. It discusses hiring and orienting associate faculty, standardization of the basic course in speech communication, and empowering,…
Descriptors: Adjunct Faculty, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Grading
Latcham, J. – 1975
Prepared for staff in the British further education system, this report describes and explains the formal staff assessment model used at Richland College, Texas. Introductory material describes the college, its student body, and its organization and structure. Next, the four components of the teacher evaluation system used in the Dallas Community…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Burson, Gerald E. – 1982
Northern Oklahoma College's current system of faculty evaluation emphasizes evaluation as an ongoing process rather than a once-a-year occurrence. New faculty members are presented with a checklist of evaluation criteria and expectations, which is to serve as a guide for performance and an avenue for communication with the department chair.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wandzilak, Thomas; Mortensen, Lynn L. – College Teaching, 1988
A model that integrates the systematic observation of student and teacher behaviors with an analysis of student achievement is presented. It assesses student learning and time use for a particular lesson and provides the instructor with immediate feedback that documents teaching effectiveness. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Instruction, College Students, Data Analysis, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andrews, Hans A.; Marzano, William A. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1984
Considers important elements of comprehensive faculty evaluation systems (e.g., provision of formative feedback for instructors performing unsatisfactorily and of incentives for excellence). Details the development and results of the evaluation system at Illinois Valley Community College. (LAL)
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Feedback
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  ...  |  30