NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 23 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fossey, Richard – Journal of College and University Student Housing, 2018
College students who reside in campus dormitories at public universities have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their dorm rooms that is protected by the fourth amendment; and officials cannot search these rooms for law enforcement purposes without a valid warrant. Non-students, however, have no such reasonable expectation of privacy in…
Descriptors: College Students, Public Colleges, Privacy, Dormitories
Uhler, Scott F.; Smith, Gregory T. – Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 2012
As Internet-based communications and interactions by and between students and school staff become more prevalent, an appreciation of school rules for student behavior is important. Students carry electronic devices, sending and receiving communications inside and outside school, so two key questions exist regarding search and seizure of such…
Descriptors: Students, Handheld Devices, Ownership, Search and Seizure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stader, David L.; Greicar, Margo B.; Stevens, David W.; Dowdy, Ray – Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2010
School administrators are expected to balance the need for school safety and good order with the rights of students to be free of unreasonable search of their person and property. This balance can be particularly difficult when over-the-counter or prescription drugs are involved. This article summarizes a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that…
Descriptors: School Safety, Administrator Responsibility, Student Rights, Drug Use
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Essex, Nathan – Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2010
Strip searches should be considered searches of last resort based on the intrusive nature of the search and the resulting impact it may have on a student. It is well established by the courts that as the intrusiveness of the search intensifies, the standard of the Fourth Amendment reasonably approaches probable cause which is a higher standard…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Search and Seizure, Human Body, Student Rights
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Staros, Kari; Williams, Charles F. – Social Education, 2007
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the people of the United States from unreasonable searches and seizures. On first reading, these protections seem clearly defined. The amendment was meant to protect Americans from the kinds of random searches and seizures that the colonists experienced under British colonial rule. Under…
Descriptors: Search and Seizure, Court Litigation, Constitutional Law, Privacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Essex, Nathan L. – Education and the Law, 2005
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution provides protection of all citizens against unreasonable search and seizure. The US Supreme Court has affirmed that the basic purpose of the Fourth Amendment is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against unreasonable intrusive searches by governmental officials. Since students possess…
Descriptors: Student Rights, Privacy, Public Schools, Search and Seizure
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1998
In a California case involving a 16-year-old girl's possession of three knives on school grounds, both a trial and Ninth Circuit court affirmed the school vice-principal's right to search and discover these weapons while enforcing a no-smoking policy. The court lectured parents and lawyers for wasting the court's time--especially after a juvenile…
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, High Schools, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glass, Thomas E. – Planning and Changing, 1987
In "New Jersey v. T.L.O." (1985), the U.S. Supreme Court reduced the evidentiary standard applying to search and seizure by school officials from "probable cause" to "reasonable suspicion." However, search of students should be done only when absolutely necessary (for safety or "order" reasons), and a…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems, School Policy
Trotter, Andrew – Executive Educator, 1995
Every year, a few administrators mishandle school searches and create spectacles similar to the New Castle, Pennsylvania, incident involving six illegally strip-searched students. Principals using "cops-and-robber" techniques to unearth contraband may not realize the potential for infringing on students' constitutional privacy rights.…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Legal Problems, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Foldesy, George; King, Dan – Clearing House, 1995
Discusses case law regarding schools and strip searches of students, and offers five generalizations regarding the matter. (SR)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems, School Law
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2005
This analysis of a November 2001 case in Botetourt County, Virginia, looks at whether the Fourth Amendment right against an unreasonable "seizure" or the 14th Amendment "liberty" for parents to control the care and custody of their children requires a ban on, or at least immediate notification regarding, detentions of a…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Constitutional Law, Student Rights, Parent Rights
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 2000
A federal district judge dismissed a suit brought by two students against a high-school principal who found marijuana in their hotel room on a senior class trip. Although the Fourth Amendment governs searches of students by school employees, employees need not have probable cause for a "reasonable" search. (MLH)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline, Drug Use, Field Trips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stader, David L. – Clearing House, 2002
Notes that students' legitimate expectations of privacy and school officials' need to maintain school discipline and safety often collide. Outlines guidelines for searching in the following instances: student lockers; drug dogs; student trips; strip searches; and urinalysis. Suggests that training for all administrators, faculty, and staff in the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Drug Use Testing, Management Development
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1987
Reviews the Supreme Court student search policy in relation to a recent decision concerning a Pima County, Arizona, high school student search that revealed cocaine but was found to be an illegal search. Also reviews the lower court decision in "Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education," which found that the school had provided its…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Crime, Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hayman, Robert; Kassouf, George – Update on Law-Related Education, 1985
The Supreme Court ruling that public school officials can search a student is examined. Two upcoming Supreme Court cases regarding whether a school board can refuse to hire a homosexual teacher and the constitutionality of an Alabama law that allows for a minute of silence for voluntary prayer or meditation are also discussed. (RM)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Homosexuality
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2