Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 5 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 27 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 101 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 516 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Killion, Joellen | 6 |
Gewertz, Catherine | 5 |
Olson, Lynn | 5 |
Rothman, Robert | 5 |
Darling-Hammond, Linda | 4 |
Murdock, Ashleigh Barbee, Ed. | 4 |
Orr, Michael | 4 |
Bailey, Tessie | 3 |
Bogue, E. Grady | 3 |
Capacia, Nemie | 3 |
Hirsh, Stephanie | 3 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 99 |
Practitioners | 68 |
Administrators | 55 |
Teachers | 55 |
Parents | 18 |
Community | 14 |
Researchers | 8 |
Students | 4 |
Counselors | 2 |
Support Staff | 2 |
Location
California | 63 |
Florida | 45 |
Ohio | 29 |
Georgia | 25 |
North Carolina | 24 |
New York | 23 |
Maryland | 21 |
Mississippi | 20 |
Illinois | 19 |
Kentucky | 19 |
Tennessee | 19 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dadey, Nathan; Gong, Brian – Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, 2023
This document is written primarily for policy makers and state department of education staff who are considering through-year assessments, as well as consultants and contractors state departments rely on. The document identifies essential things to consider when designing or evaluating a through-year assessment program. The paper is organized into…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Progress Monitoring, Summative Evaluation, Standardized Tests
Dadey, Nathan; Evans, Carla M.; Lorié, Will – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2023
Through-year assessment is enjoying a surge of attention. A through-year assessment program is: (1) Administered in multiple distinct sessions during a school year; and (2) Intended to support (a) the production and use of a summative determination, and (b) one additional aim. More than a dozen states are designing, piloting, or implementing…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, Accountability, Evaluation Methods
Huynh, Ryan; Midyett, Chase; Quan, Delphean; Thurlow, Martha L.; Lazarus, Sheryl S. – National Center on Educational Outcomes, 2022
This report outlines the approaches that state education agencies (SEAs) have taken in defining and using formative assessment practices, including practices to explicitly support students with disabilities. At the state level, there have been efforts to develop or adopt formal definitions of formative assessment practices that guide how these…
Descriptors: State Departments of Education, Formative Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
W. Christopher Brandt; Nathan Dadey; Carla Evans – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2024
Recent years have produced a surge in interest in improving state assessment programs. Many states are designing new assessments. Much of this innovation is aimed at addressing longstanding areas of unhappiness with typical domain-sampled, end-of-year state assessments: States want to streamline assessment activities, enhance the instructional…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Achievement Tests, Educational Testing, State Standards
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, 2022
The Smarter Balanced Assessment System consists of three components: (1) interim assessments designed to support teaching and learning throughout the year; (2) a suite of tools and resources in Tools for Teachers that support classroom-based formative assessment practices; and (3) end-of-year summative assessments designed for accountability…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Instructional Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Summative Evaluation
Miguel A. Cardona – Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, US Department of Education, 2022
Data from high-quality State assessments can inform instruction and help school leaders drive resources to the schools and students that need them the most. This dear colleague letter from the U.S. Secretary of Education reminds all who report and interpret student outcomes this year that assessment data has always been meant to be used…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Decision Making, Resource Allocation
Public School Forum of North Carolina, 2021
Since March 2020, COVID-19 has required the implementation of remote learning options in K-12 public schools across North Carolina, ranging from fully online classroom experiences to hybrid scenarios in which students attend school both in person and remotely. In some locales, students continue to attend school in person most of the time, but with…
Descriptors: Accountability, School Safety, Distance Education, Educational Change
Region 17 Comprehensive Center, 2024
States have different reasoning, timelines, and governing agencies that determine why and when academic standards are revised. A state review of academic standards involves many steps--a process that can take months or years. This guide provides a checklist for state education leaders to consider when developing the various components of an…
Descriptors: State Departments of Education, Academic Standards, Evaluation Methods, State Standards
Fitzsimmons, Pat – Aurora Institute, 2020
Local comprehensive assessment systems (LCAS) are essential for ensuring equitable learning opportunities for all students. They have the potential to ensure that each and every learner meets high expectations that are set across all content areas. The Vermont Agency of Education held convenings with educational leaders to refine tools and…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, School Districts, Summative Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Gates, Susan M.; Woo, Ashley; Xenakis, Lea; Wang, Elaine Lin; Herman, Rebecca; Andrew, Megan; Todd, Ivy – RAND Corporation, 2020
States play a role in fostering an environment that develops and supports effective school leaders. Prior research has highlighted opportunities to enhance state involvement in supporting school leadership through a range of policy levers, especially by promoting improvements to principal preparation (Manna, 2015; Davis, 2016). The Wallace…
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Principals, State Policy, Educational Policy
Regional Educational Laboratory Central, 2021
This Study Snapshot highlights key findings from a larger study examining the validity and reliability of the Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool (K-CAT), a newly developed tool for assessing the performance of teacher candidates. The study team used interviews with cooperating teachers, content experts' ratings of the alignment of the K-CAT to…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Test Reliability, Evaluation Methods, Preservice Teachers
Ferguson, Daniel – Child Care & Early Education Research Connections, 2018
This Research-to-Policy Resource List provides resources in the "Research Connections" library on statewide KEAs [Kindergarten entry assessments]. It does not address local KEA efforts or broader issues related to child assessment more generally. The first section presents publications that discuss issues surrounding the development and…
Descriptors: Kindergarten, School Readiness, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Alaska Department of Education & Early Development, 2023
The Alaska Science Assessment is administered annually statewide to students in grades 5, 8 and 10 and is a summative assessment designed to measure a student's knowledge of the "K-12 Science Standards for Alaska," which were adopted in June 2019. Summative assessments are designed to provide a snapshot of student, school, or program…
Descriptors: State Standards, Science Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Summative Evaluation
Region 12 Comprehensive Center, 2024
Research suggests that students who participate in formative assessment perform better on measures of academic achievement than students who do not. To raise school and systematic performance, teachers need access to high-quality, rigorous tools designed to provide timely and individualized feedback for student learning. According to a report…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Statewide Planning, Measurement
Schiller, Ellen; Hayes, Susan; Nagle, Katherine – IDEA Data Center, 2020
This white paper offers an approach for using a theory of action as an outline to develop the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Phase II evaluation questions and plan that will guide the SSIP work in Phase III and beyond. Key areas of focus include generating evaluation questions at each level of outcomes, identifying essential steps and…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Educational Improvement, Educational Legislation, Equal Education