NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Young, Jeffrey R. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2008
Several Web sites have emerged in recent years that encourage students to upload old exams to build a bank of test questions and answers that can be consulted by other students. This article reports that some professors have raised concerns about these sites, arguing that these could be used to cheat, especially if professors reuse old tests.…
Descriptors: Web Sites, Test Items, Ethics, Cheating
Lehman, Kathy – Library Media Connection, 2009
The new AASL standards clearly spell out ethical responsibilities, which school librarians strive to instill and model as they work with staff and students. In this article, the author presents the AASL standards together with some tips and lesson ideas which she and her library partner have put into practice within their library media program.
Descriptors: School Libraries, Ethics, Information Literacy, Media Specialists
Chronicle of Higher Education, 1987
A federal appeals court upheld the authority of the University of Michigan to revoke a master's degree awarded to a student found to have fabricated a discovery on which his thesis was based. A degree can be revoked without a court proceeding or trial when allegations of fraud are involved. (MLW)
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, Cheating, Codes of Ethics, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Connell, Christopher – Educational Record, 1981
Cheating by students in academic assignments, especially term papers, cheating on tests, and altering or forging a university document are discussed. Efforts of the University of Maryland to crack down on cheating and to produce a workable code of student conduct are described. (MLW)
Descriptors: Assignments, Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martin, Brian – Thought and Action, 1989
A series of highly publicized cases of alleged fraud in the Australian academic community are described. Each case reveals an apparent failure of peer review. The right to pursue investigations and make comments that may offend powerful figures within the scholarly community is precarious. (MLW)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Faculty, Ethics, Fraud