Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Goal Orientation | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Behavior Standards | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Campuses | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Communication Research | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Disclosure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Anderman, Eric M. | 1 |
| Denbow, Jessica | 1 |
| Henningsen, Mary Lynn Miller | 1 |
| Koenka, Alison C. | 1 |
| Valde, Kathleen S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAnderman, Eric M.; Koenka, Alison C. – Theory Into Practice, 2017
Academic cheating occurs frequently in schools. Cheating is a deliberative act, in that students make a conscious decision to engage in academic dishonesty. Students' achievement goals, which are malleable, often guide the ways that students make such decisions. Educators can incorporate various instructional practices and support academic…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Cheating, Student Behavior, Goal Orientation
Henningsen, Mary Lynn Miller; Valde, Kathleen S.; Denbow, Jessica – Communication Education, 2013
Academic misconduct is a serious, pervasive, communication phenomenon on college campuses. In this study, the goals-plans-action model (Dillard, 1990) was used as a theoretical framework to investigate peer confrontation of cheating and whistle-blowing to a course instructor. In an experiment, participants were asked to respond to measures of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Cheating, Campuses, Disclosure
