Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Form Classes (Languages) | 2 |
Nouns | 2 |
Prediction | 2 |
Articulation (Speech) | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
Dictionaries | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Language Processing | 1 |
Linguistic Theory | 1 |
Models | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 1 |
Cognitive Science | 1 |
Author
Tanenhaus, Michael K. | 2 |
Aslin, Richard N. | 1 |
Magnuson, James S. | 1 |
Runner, Jeffrey T. | 1 |
Sussman, Rachel S. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Magnuson, James S.; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Aslin, Richard N. – Cognition, 2008
In many domains of cognitive processing there is strong support for bottom-up priority and delayed top-down (contextual) integration. We ask whether this applies to supra-lexical context that could potentially constrain lexical access. Previous findings of early context integration in word recognition have typically used constraints that can be…
Descriptors: Nouns, Word Recognition, Cognitive Processes, Form Classes (Languages)
Runner, Jeffrey T.; Sussman, Rachel S.; Tanenhaus, Michael K. – Cognitive Science, 2006
Binding theory (e.g., Chomsky, 1981) has played a central role in both syntactic theory and models of language processing. Its constraints are designed to predict that the referential domains of pronouns and reflexives are nonoverlapping, that is, are complementary; these constraints are also thought to play a role in online reference resolution.…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Nouns, Eye Movements, Form Classes (Languages)