NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)11
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 208 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Currie-Knight, Kevin – Philosophical Studies in Education, 2011
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) and Thomas Huxley (1852-1895) had different, but substantial, effects on the history of education. Rousseau's educational theories supplied the intellectual foundation for pedagogical progressivism. Huxley's educational writings helped to enlarge the scope of the British curriculum to include such things as…
Descriptors: Educational Theories, Educational History, Vocational Education, Nature Nurture Controversy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chitty, Clyde – FORUM: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 2011
This article is based on a talk that was given by the author at the Institute of Historical Research on 3 February 2011, on the Victorian polymath Francis Galton and the malign legacy of his eugenic theories. It pays tribute to the pioneering work of the late Brian Simon in challenging the whole idea of "fixed innate intelligence" and in…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Genetics, Selection, Racial Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davidoff, Jules; Goldstein, Julie; Roberson, Debi – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009
We respond to the commentary of Franklin, Wright, and Davies ("Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102", 239-245 [2009]) by returning to the simple contrast between nature and nurture. We find no evidence from the toddler data that makes us revise our ideas that color categories are learned and never innate. (Contains 1 figure.)
Descriptors: Child Psychology, Nature Nurture Controversy, Toddlers, Color
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kan, Daniel B.; Reichard, Rebecca J. – Educational Considerations, 2009
With the success of graduates directly influencing the college's reputation and ranking, leadership propensity should be an important selection criterion in higher education institution's undergraduate admissions processes, but is it? For most colleges and universities, selection is done through a paper application containing only a sliver of the…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Leadership, Aptitude, Admission Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kritt, David W. – Democracy & Education, 2011
In response to Eugene Matusov's article in this journal, Kritt addresses assumptions of the large-scale testing central to NCLB. Discussion of studies of urban kindergarten children that examine cognitive variability, including the assertion of ability, focuses on how this affects the student as a learner, as well as as a teacher. In contrast,…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Politics of Education, Educational Assessment, Testing
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2008
The connection that critics make between medical genetics and eugenics is historically fallacious. Activists on the political right are as mistaken as activists on the political left: Genetic screening was not eugenics in the past, is not eugenics in the present, and, unless its technological systems become radically transformed, will not be…
Descriptors: Genetics, Nature Nurture Controversy, Diagnostic Tests, Screening Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rennie, Scott – Journal of Environmental Education, 2008
From its inception, environmental education (EE) has shouldered the imposition of impartiality on its methods and practices. Considering the reality of global climate change, the author urges the adoption of the more accurate theory of humans' relation to the natural world. This theory necessitates partiality toward healthy, functioning natural…
Descriptors: Environmental Education, Climate, Nature Nurture Controversy, Advocacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lykken, David T. – American Psychologist, 2007
Comments on the article by E. Diener, R. E. Lucas, and C. N. Scollon (see record 2006-05893-003) which cited a study by Tellegen et al. in which the Well-Being scale of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), administered to 44 pairs of monozygotic reared-apart (MZA) twins, yielded a within-pair correlation of 0.48. I contend that,…
Descriptors: Well Being, Self Concept, Quality of Life, Twins
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McLafferty, Charles L. – American Psychologist, 2006
Sir Francis Galton's (1869/1892) notion of nature versus nurture is a cornerstone of psychology: It was recently featured in two issues of the Monitor (March and April 2004) and was infused throughout the January 2005 issue of the American Psychologist. R. L. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, and K. K. Kidd offered keen insights into the pitfalls in…
Descriptors: Nature Nurture Controversy, Psychology, Intelligence, Race
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ellis, Michael V.; Robbins, Erica S. – Journal of Counseling and Development, 1990
Presents interview with Jerome Kagan who has studied the role of biology as a major determinant of human behavior for more than three decades. Claims results of this research have had significant impact on the field of developmental psychology and on understanding of temperamental factors. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: Biographies, Developmental Psychology, Interviews, Nature Nurture Controversy
Mumford, Michael D.; Mobley, Michele I. – Creativity Research Journal, 1989
In reviewing the Lumsden and Findlay model of creative ontogeny and its potential influences on geneculture coevolution, the authors found it consistent with certain aspects of the creative process and suggestive of promising new research avenues. They also concluded that biologically based models, especially concerning cultural innovation, must…
Descriptors: Creativity, Culture, Models, Nature Nurture Controversy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eckland, Bruce K. – American Journal of Education, 1980
Argues that the authors of "Who Gets Ahead?" (Jencks et al., 1979) were wrong to underplay the actual importance of measured ability in the status-attainment process and to claim that the United States is not meritocratic. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Nature Nurture Controversy, Racial Factors, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lester, David – Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 1986
Reviews genetic influence on suicide. Reviews methodologies for studying the nature-nurture issue and examines their applicability to the study of suicide. Reviews research from the methodologically sound strategies. Examines work by Uematsu using an approach different from any of the conventional methodologies. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Genetics, Heredity, Nature Nurture Controversy, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lerner, Richard M. – Human Development, 1980
Distinguishes between two types of explanation of epigenesis, predetermined and probabilistic, and proposes that the second type is more scientifically useful. (SS)
Descriptors: Biology, Developmental Psychology, Nature Nurture Controversy, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Skovholt, Thomas M. – Journal of Counseling and Development, 1990
Presents interview with Thomas Bouchard, a leading researcher of identical twins reared apart. Describes major themes in the Minnesota twin research. Claims, although genetic influence is central, Bouchard pleas for the impact of environmental factors in optimal human development. Includes Bouchard's surprising experiences, current focus, and…
Descriptors: Counseling, Genetics, Heredity, Nature Nurture Controversy
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  14