Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Pretests Posttests | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Vocabulary | 2 |
| Vocabulary Development | 2 |
| American Sign Language | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Emergent Literacy | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Hearing (Physiology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Alabama | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Reading to Deaf Children Who Sign: A Response to Williams (2012) and Suggestions for Future Research
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAndrews, Jean F. – American Annals of the Deaf, 2012
A commentary on Williams's (2012) invited article on the use of adapted vocabulary learning interventions focuses on three areas: (a) Vocabulary interventions with storybook reading originally designed for hearing children can be adapted for deaf children. (b) Teachers are invited to reflect on how the read-aloud process in English differs from…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Word Recognition, Emergent Literacy, Deafness
Mason, Beniko; Krashen, Stephen – TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, 2010
File and Adams (2010) conclude that their data confirm the superiority of form-focused vocabulary instruction over incidental acquisition. The authors of this response argue that File and Adams's data actually confirm the reality, robustness, and possible superiority of incidental acquisition. Their subjects heard two passages read to them that…
Descriptors: Reader Response, Vocabulary, Incidental Learning, Vocabulary Development
