Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Universities | 3 |
Administration | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Laboratories | 2 |
Nuclear Weapons | 2 |
Opinions | 2 |
Policy | 2 |
Science Education | 2 |
Court Litigation | 1 |
Federal Legislation | 1 |
Gun Control | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Alger, Jonathan – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2008
By the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court will issue its first decision in many decades on the meaning of the right to keep and bear arms under the Constitution. The ruling could have a significant impact on federal gun-control regulations. The Second Amendment has historically not been held to apply to state regulations, but a decision by the…
Descriptors: Weapons, Court Litigation, Gun Control, Universities

Kahn, James S. – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1986
Promulgates the view that university management of weapons laboratories provides the best scientific results, and more independent advice than could be possible under government or industrial management. Focuses on Los Alamos and Livermore national laboratories, operated by the University of California. (An opposing viewpoint is presented in SE…
Descriptors: Administration, Higher Education, Laboratories, Nuclear Weapons

Archer, Dane – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1986
Offers reasons why universities should not manage weapons laboratories, such as the Los Alamos and Livermore national laboratories, operated by the University of California. (A viewpoint favoring such university management is presented in SE 538 518.) (JN)
Descriptors: Administration, Higher Education, Laboratories, Nuclear Weapons