NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chapman, Ross L. – Journal of Management Education, 2012
This commentary presents an Australian perspective on Balkin and Mello's "Facilitating and Creating Synergies between Teaching and Research: The Role of the Academic Administrator." It addresses one particularly important aspect of the separation of teaching and research in business schools; namely, the increasing dominance of…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Educational Environment, College Faculty, Administrators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Needham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Ways for improving college level faculty evaluation are examined. Three criteria are discussed: research performance, teaching performance, and administrative performance. Desirable features of faculty rewards systems are also described. (RM)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Needham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Describes a theoretical model for evaluating college faculty that can improve faculty performance and resource allocation. Characteristics of the model, appropriate evaluation criteria for teaching, research, administrative, and other activities, and departmental procedures for determining evaluation criteria and weights are discussed. (AM)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Economics Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Petty, Gregory C. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 1991
Guidelines for agricultural education faculty promotion/tenure include (1) assessment of institutional expectations (categorized by teaching or research institution); (2) documentation of teaching, personal attributes, advising, research, publications, committee and association work, time in rank, public service, and graduate student supervision;…
Descriptors: Agricultural Education, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shapiro, Eugene D.; Coleman, David L. – Academic Medicine, 2000
Discusses the importance of the scholarship of application, incentives for such scholarship (e.g., readiness of funding for directly applicable research), ways to evaluate such scholarship (create a more expansive peer-review process), ways to reward such scholarship, and ways to nurture such scholarship (rigorous training in methodology and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Schliessmann, Michael R. – 1994
For a communication studies administrator, the scholar envisioned in Ernest Boyer's "Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate" is an instructive guide to faculty and administrators pondering the balance or relationship between teaching and research. It is an immodest claim that each discipline teaches well but broadly…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Administration, Educational Philosophy, Faculty Development
Martin, Robert E. – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 2006
Given the public's demand for better teaching (and its indifference to scholarship), one might think there would be a vigorous demand for high quality instructors at all levels of higher education. Instead, the healthiest market remains that for scholars. In this article, the author discusses the differences in the markets for scholars and…
Descriptors: Demand Occupations, Labor Market, College Faculty, College Instruction
Antczak, Fred – 1994
This paper advances 22 ideas for reducing the conflict between teaching and research demands of faculty at public research universities, based on suggestions generated by an ad hoc group of professors at the University of Iowa. Departments should try to make teaching as documentable as research, make teaching accomplishments as…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Colleges, Departments, Educational Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Soderberg, L. O. – College Teaching, 1985
The continued nonevaluation of teaching contributes to the dominance of research in the evaluation of faculty members. For both promotion and salary increases, the number of articles published is basically the definition of research. The idea that research is more important than teaching is discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newman, Kathy – Academe, 1999
A junior faculty member reflects on the dilemma of that professional position, noting that its anxieties fall into two categories: "Is this all there is?" and "What if we lose it?" She examines problems with, and prohibitions against, speaking one's mind in that position, sees solutions as being institutional or individual, and examines how…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload
American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC. – 1980
Six essays are collected on the subject of the quality of institutions and their instruction. In "When Does a College Deserve to be called 'High Quality'," by Alexander W. Astin, various perspectives of quality are outlined and commented upon: the mystical view, reputational view, resources view, outcomes view, and value-added view. Problems with…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Attitudes, Educational Counseling
Shaughnessy, Michael F.; And Others – 1991
This paper addresses difficult issues in evaluation of college faculty for scholarship, teaching, and service particularly noting areas that trouble faculty themselves. A section on evaluation of teaching notes long standing debate and disagreement. This section then lists many of the central questions around evaluation of teaching and notes that…
Descriptors: Academic Advising, College Faculty, College Instruction, Committees
Illinois State Board of Higher Education, Springfield. – 1995
As part of a larger Illinois Board of Higher Education initiative, Priorities, Quality, and Productivity (PQP), this paper reports on recent and current efforts to clarify faculty roles and responsibilities. A background section reviews PQP development and earlier reports and statements on faculty roles and responsibilities issued between 1993 and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Colleges, Community Colleges