NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Where to Look for American Sign Language (ASL) Sublexical Structure in the Visual World: Reply to Salverda (2016)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lieberman, Amy M.; Borovsky, Arielle; Hatrak, Marla; Mayberry, Rachel I. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
In this reply to Salverda (2016), we address a critique of the claims made in our recent study of real-time processing of American Sign Language (ASL) signs using a novel visual world eye-tracking paradigm (Lieberman, Borovsky, Hatrak, & Mayberry, 2015). Salverda asserts that our data do not support our conclusion that native signers and…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Eye Movements, Phonology, Visual Perception
Absence of Sublexical Representations in Late-Learning Signers? A Statistical Critique of Lieberman et al. (2015)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Salverda, Anne Pier – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Lieberman, Borovsky, Hatrak, and Mayberry (2015) used a modified version of the visual-world paradigm to examine the real-time processing of signs in American Sign Language. They examined the activation of phonological and semantic competitors in native signers and late-learning signers and concluded that their results provide evidence that the…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Deafness, Native Speakers, Second Language Learning
Orthographic Reform in Kope.
Clifton, John M. – 1986
The role of local attitudes in recent orthographic reform in Kope is examined. The previous Kope orthographic tradition is outlined, and two areas apparently requiring reform (nasal/fricative variation and vowel clusters versus semivowels). The concerns and the greater awareness among the locals regarding these orthographic changes are explored.…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Community Attitudes, Foreign Countries, Language Attitudes
Directionality in Contrastive Analysis.
James, Carl – 1978
A contrastive analysis (CA) does not require commitment to directionality. Even asymmetrical interlingual correspondence can be handled by adirectional statements. If well executed, a CA is capable of handling three pairs of L2 learning phenomena: (1) going from language A to language B and vice versa; (2) productive and receptive command; and (3)…
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Grammar, Interference (Language), Language Dominance