Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 38 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Fincher, Cameron | 3 |
Shapiro, Arthur S. | 3 |
Bacharach, Samuel B. | 2 |
Bing, Robert | 2 |
Birnbaum, Michael H. | 2 |
Chelimsky, Eleanor | 2 |
Dye, Linda | 2 |
George, Paul S. | 2 |
Griffiths, Jose-Marie | 2 |
King, Donald W. | 2 |
Rohrer, Daniel M. | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 51 |
Administrators | 23 |
Researchers | 21 |
Media Staff | 7 |
Policymakers | 7 |
Teachers | 7 |
Counselors | 2 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Canada | 6 |
Australia | 3 |
United Kingdom | 3 |
United States | 3 |
Africa | 1 |
Bangladesh | 1 |
California | 1 |
Costa Rica | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Hungary | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped… | 4 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thompson, Winston C. – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2020
In this review of the "Educational Goods," the author provides a set of comments that might extend the worthy framework provided by Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift. In particular, the author calls attention to the ways in which continued work within this project might broaden its conceptualisation of educational goods, increase the scope…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Models, Decision Making, Parent Rights
Tillson, John – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2020
In this paper, I offer Brighouse et al some friendly suggestions for expanding the notion of 'educational goods', pose some challenges for their book's decision-making framework and offer an opportunity for them to fill some small, but interesting lacunas. I start by comparing their typology of desirable educational outcomes with alternative…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Models, Classification, Epistemology
Hand, Michael – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2020
In this brief comment on "Educational Goods," I raise two worries about the authors' proposed normative framework for educational decision-makers. The first concerns the omission of rationality, or responsiveness to reasons, from the list of educational goods; the second concerns the inclusion of parental interests in the list of…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Decision Making, Models, Role of Education
Kelly E. Tumy; Vonthisha DeFriend, Contributor; Jordan James, Contributor; Amber Funderburgh, Contributor; Alexandra Babino, Contributor – English in Texas, 2024
This article explores how TCTELA's 2024 Teachers of the Year forged the future through their literacy teaching at the elementary, middle school, high school, and college levels. Each essay captures how they understand their work as literacy educators and intentionally educate their students toward a brighter future amid trying local contexts. The…
Descriptors: Recognition (Achievement), Elementary School Teachers, Middle School Teachers, High School Teachers
Gaševic, Dragan; Kovanovic, Vitomir; Joksimovic, Srecko – Learning: Research and Practice, 2017
The field of learning analytics was founded with the goal to harness vast amounts of data about learning collected by the extensive use of technology. After the early formation, the field has now entered the next phase of maturation with a growing community who has an evident impact on research, practice, policy, and decision-making. Although…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Data Analysis, Research and Development, Theory Practice Relationship
Sisti, Dominic A.; Baum-Baicker, Cynthia – American Psychologist, 2012
This article represents comments on the original article, "Nonrational processes in ethical decision making" by M. D. Rogerson et al (EJ945176). The current authors suggest that Rogerson, Gottlieb, Handelsman, Knapp, and Younggren (October 2011) presumed that the only ethical theories available for grounding decision-making models are of the…
Descriptors: Ethics, Decision Making, Theories, Models
Rogerson, Mark D.; Gottlieb, Michael C.; Handelsman, Mitchell M.; Knapp, Samuel; Younggren, Jeffrey – American Psychologist, 2012
Responds to the comments by Pomerantz and Sisti and Baum-Baicker on the current authors' original article, "Nonrational processes in ethical decision making". Pomerantz (2012) further explicated one interpersonal and contextual factor--the perceived characteristics of the recipient of any act. He cited evidence that these characteristics affect…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Ethics, Decision Making, Context Effect
Brewer, T. Jameson; Lubienski, Christopher – National Education Policy Center, 2017
A new report by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), "Differences by Design?," compares differences in approaches and demographics between and among charter school models and local "traditional public schools." Using three national data sets, the report effectively captures the national universe of charter schools. It…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Student Characteristics, Models, School Segregation
Two Distinct Exploratory Behaviors in Decisions from Experience: Comment on Gonzalez and Dutt (2011)
Hills, Thomas T.; Hertwig, Ralph – Psychological Review, 2012
Gonzalez and Dutt (2011) recently reported that trends during sampling, prior to a consequential risky decision, reveal a gradual movement from exploration to exploitation. That is, even when search imposes no immediate costs, people adopt the same pattern manifest in costly search: early exploration followed by later exploitation. From this…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Models, Inferences, Sampling
Pomerantz, Andrew M. – American Psychologist, 2012
Comments on the original article, "Nonrational processes in ethical decision making" by M. D. Rogerson et al (see record 2011-19198-001). Among the many insightful points made by Rogerson, Gottlieb, Handelsman, Knapp, and Younggren (October 2011) regarding nonrational processes in ethical decision making, one deserves further explication: Many of…
Descriptors: Ethics, Decision Making, Psychologists, Interaction
Gonzalez, Cleotilde; Dutt, Varun – Psychological Review, 2012
Hills and Hertwig (2012) challenge the proposed similarity of the exploration-exploitation transitions found in Gonzalez and Dutt (2011) between the 2 experimental paradigms of decisions from experience (sampling and repeated-choice), which was predicted by an instance-based learning (IBL) model. The heart of their argument is that in the sampling…
Descriptors: Data, Models, Learning Processes, Criticism
Hotaling, Jared M.; Busemeyer, Jerome R.; Li, Jiyun – Psychological Review, 2010
Tsetsos, Usher, and Chater (2010) presented several criticisms of decision field theory (DFT) involving its distance function, instability under externally controlled stopping times, and lack of robustness to various multialternative choice scenarios. Here, we counter those claims with a specification of a distance function based on the…
Descriptors: Criticism, Decision Making, Prediction, Models
Ghaffarzadegan, Navid; Stewart, Thomas R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
Elwin, Juslin, Olsson, and Enkvist (2007) and Henriksson, Elwin, and Juslin (2010) offered the constructivist coding hypothesis to describe how people code the outcomes of their decisions when availability of feedback is conditional on the decision. They provided empirical evidence only for the 0.5 base rate condition. This commentary argues that…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Feedback (Response), Constructivism (Learning), Hypothesis Testing
Usher, Marius; Tsetsos, Konstantinos; Chater, Nick – Psychological Review, 2010
In this post scrit, the authors discuss an article by Hotaling, Busemeyer, and Li which provided a valuable reply to the challenges the current authors raised for the decision field theory (DFT) account of preference reversal in multiattribute choice. They agree with Hotaling, Busemeyer, and Li's observation that with the addition of an internal…
Descriptors: Prediction, Models, Decision Making, Experiments
Birnbaum, Michael H. – Psychological Review, 2011
This article contrasts 2 approaches to analyzing transitivity of preference and other behavioral properties in choice data. The approach of Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober (2011) assumes that on each choice, a decision maker samples randomly from a mixture of preference orders to determine whether "A" is preferred to "B." In contrast, Birnbaum…
Descriptors: Evidence, Testing, Computation, Probability