Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Grammar | 4 |
Language Dominance | 4 |
Language Processing | 3 |
Adults | 2 |
Children | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Evidence | 2 |
Native Speakers | 2 |
Second Language Learning | 2 |
Second Languages | 2 |
American Indian Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kroskrity, Paul V. – American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 2011
In this discussion of a set of studies that fits the trope of "Indian Languages in Unexpected Places," I explore the obvious necessity of developing a relevant notion of linguistic "leakage" following a famous image from the writings of the linguistic anthropologist Edward Sapir. Though in its original use, the concept applied more to the order of…
Descriptors: Language Dominance, Boarding Schools, Grammar, American Indians
Birdsong, David – Applied Psycholinguistics, 2006
Clahsen and Felser (CF) deserve praise for their superlative synthesis of literature relating to grammatical processing, as well as for their original contributions to this area of research. CF "explore the idea that there might be fundamental differences between child L1 and adult L2 processing." The researchers present evidence that adult second…
Descriptors: Evidence, Language Dominance, Grammar, Second Languages
Clahsen, Harald; Felser, Claudia – Applied Psycholinguistics, 2006
The core idea that we argued for in the target article was that grammatical processing in a second language (L2) is fundamentally different from grammatical processing in one's native (first) language (L1). Our major source of evidence for this claim comes from experimental psycholinguistic studies investigating morphological and syntactic…
Descriptors: Evidence, Language Dominance, Cues, Semantics
James, Carl – 1978
A contrastive analysis (CA) does not require commitment to directionality. Even asymmetrical interlingual correspondence can be handled by adirectional statements. If well executed, a CA is capable of handling three pairs of L2 learning phenomena: (1) going from language A to language B and vice versa; (2) productive and receptive command; and (3)…
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Grammar, Interference (Language), Language Dominance