Descriptor
Federal Legislation | 51 |
Higher Education | 26 |
Retirement Benefits | 25 |
College Faculty | 23 |
Older Adults | 21 |
Age Discrimination | 20 |
Teacher Retirement | 20 |
Mandatory Retirement | 17 |
Retirement | 15 |
Tenure | 12 |
Personnel Policy | 11 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 5 |
Practitioners | 5 |
Policymakers | 4 |
Location
Canada | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Holden, Karen C.; Hansen, W. Lee – New Directions for Higher Education, 1989
Uncapping the mandatory retirement age is unlikely to alter retirement age by much, but it will lead to substantially higher pensions for faculty members who continue to work. Institutions must monitor retirement-age behavior in order to restructure pension and other benefits appropriately to meet income and retirement objectives. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Employment Patterns, Federal Legislation
Morrison, Malcolm H. – Aging and Work: A Journal on Age, Work and Retirement, 1981
Examines how the 1978 Amendments to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act will affect the future labor force. Discusses how retirement age policies hurt older workers, changes that are expected to occur, how pension benefits affect the older work force, and why a linked employment/retirement policy is urged. (Editor/CT)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Federal Legislation, Older Adults, Older Workers

Shapiro, Larry E. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
Important considerations for institutions wanting to establish supplementary early retirement benefits to encourage the practice are outlined. Regulations concerning pension plans, tax-sheltered annuities, and deferred compensation are reviewed. Individually negotiated early retirement supplements are not recommended. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Federal Legislation, Federal Regulation, Higher Education

Swan, Peter N. – Journal of College and University Law, 1992
Economic underpinnings of retirement incentives and case law leading to the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act (1986) are reviewed; implications for early retirement incentives for college faculty are considered. It is concluded that congressional intent is not to foreclose such incentives and that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act…
Descriptors: Age, Age Discrimination, College Administration, College Faculty
Calvin, Allen – AAHE Bulletin, 1984
Issues of mandatory retirement for faculty are discussed. In 1978, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act was amended to raise the age of forced retirement to 70, but tenured college professors were exempted from the protections of the amendment. Arguments raised by advocates of forced retirement for tenured college professors include: the…
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, College Faculty, Federal Legislation, Higher Education

Atkins, G. Lawrence; Erbs, Laura A. – Generations, 1989
The federal legislative agenda must focus on three trends: (1) the rise in health care costs; (2) the serious decline in the personal savings rate and the effect on pensions; and (3) the lengthening period of retirement as a combination of early retirement and longer life spans. (SK)
Descriptors: Aging (Individuals), Federal Legislation, Financial Support, Health Care Costs
Richardson, Thomas – ADE Bulletin, 1989
Looks at various issues set before English departments by recent federal legislation uncapping the mandatory retirement age. Examines the "worst case" scenario of unlimited tenure. Argues that while it is too early to predict the effects of this legislation, preliminary indications show that incentives for early retirement are working.…
Descriptors: Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Early Retirement, English Departments
Bompey, Stuart H.; Liebert, Esther – National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions Newsletter, 1986
Age and sex discrimination are addressed in two newsletter articles. In "Age Discrimination in Faculty Employment," Stuart H. Bompey reviews employment litigation issues and their impact on the collective bargaining process. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) stipulates that individuals may be mandatorily retired at age 70;…
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation
American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC. – 1978
Changes in federal law regarding mandatory retirement policy, while not directly covering higher education until 1982, will have much earlier educational and financial impacts on colleges and universities. Educational decision-makers will modify their behavior in such areas as hiring and tenure decisions, retirement decisions, and faculty pay…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, College Administration, College Faculty, Decision Making

Academe, 1987
The American Association of University Professors' Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure examines the implications for tenure of federal legislation forbidding mandatory retirement because of age. (MSE)
Descriptors: Age, Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Federal Legislation
Finkin, Matthew W. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1989
To advocate replacement of traditional tenure arrangements by fixed-term contracts is a misreading of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act amendments, and may threaten academic freedom. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Contracts

Schoenfeld, Clay – CUPA Journal, 1993
Changes in retirement patterns at colleges and universities can be expected because of demographic reasons and because of federal and state legislation uncapping mandatory retirement. Institutional policies that will encourage reluctant older faculty to retire need to address the three fundamental components of successful employee retirement: (1)…
Descriptors: Administrators, Age Discrimination, Aging in Academia, College Administration

Day, David S.; And Others – Journal of Legal Education, 1991
This article examines the retirement plans and personal characteristics of 273 senior law school faculty, focusing on health status, income, job satisfaction, and preferred age of retirement. The study suggests that early retirement incentives and a "senior faculty" alternative to full retirement are positive institutional options. (DB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compliance (Legal), Early Retirement, Federal Legislation
Burkhauser, Richard V.; Quinn, Joseph F. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1989
An analysis of the impact of increasing the minimum mandatory retirement age on the retirement patterns of older adults across the entire economy suggests that because of the strong disincentives to work embedded in social security and many employee pensions, most workers will continue to retire in their early sixties. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Employment Patterns, Federal Legislation

Finkin, Matthew W. – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
Proposed alternatives to the current tenure system are administratively, legally, and ethically unsatisfactory. If uncapping the retirement of faculty presents significant problems, which is not yet clear, the academic community would be better advised to explore voluntary early retirement programs and policies. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, College Administration, College Faculty, Court Litigation