NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bramley, Tom – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
There is something about the topic of validity that seems to provoke dissatisfaction in many of those who encounter it--a sense that something is not right, and that something needs to be done to sort it out. Paul E. Newton in his target essay does not attempt a radical reconstruction of the validity edifice. His position is that the "consensus…
Descriptors: Validity, Measurement, Construct Validity, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kane, Michael – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Paul E. Newton's article on the consensus definition of validity tackles a number of big issues and makes a number of strong claims. I agreed with much of what he said, and I disagreed with a number of his claims, but I found his article to be consistently interesting and thought provoking (whether I agreed or not). I will focus on three general…
Descriptors: Validity, Construct Validity, Tests, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Downey, Ryan; Farhady, Hossein; Present-Thomas, Rebecca; Suzuki, Masanori; Van Moere, Alistair – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2008
This article responds to a critique of Ordinate Corporation's "Versant for English" test (formerly PhonePass and SET-10). The critique (Chun, 2006) purports to apply the language task framework of Bachman and Palmer (1996) and the Test Fairness framework of Kunnan (2004) as guides for an analysis. However, the analysis fails to apply either…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Construct Validity, English (Second Language), Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Briggs, Derek C. – Educational Researcher, 2008
When causal inferences are to be synthesized across multiple studies, efforts to establish the magnitude of a causal effect should be balanced by an effort to evaluate the generalizability of the effect. The evaluation of generalizability depends on two factors that are given little attention in current syntheses: construct validity and external…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Construct Validity, Inferences, Educational Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petty, Richard E.; Brinol, Pablo – Psychological Bulletin, 2006
Comments on the article by B. Gawronski and G. V. Bodenhausen (see record 2006-10465-003). A metacognitive model (MCM) is presented to describe how automatic (implicit) and deliberative (explicit) measures of attitudes respond to change attempts. The model assumes that contemporary implicit measures tap quick evaluative associations, whereas…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Evaluation, Criticism, Attitude Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaufman, Alan S. – School Psychology Quarterly, 1994
Explores alternative empirical foundations of verbal and performance dichotomous constructs of Wechsler Intelligence Scales. Argues that Macmann and Barnett's position on the value of these constructs are based upon narrow interpretations of investigative results. Supports contention with IQ data from investigations of diverse populations. (CRR)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Counseling, Evaluation, Intelligence Tests