Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Barlow, Dudley – Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 2006
The No Child Left Behind Act requires the states to test their students every year to determine how many of them have achieved proficiency in, among other areas, math, science, and reading. The law also requires that the states participate yearly in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which calls itself "the Nation's…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Educational Assessment, Intellectual Disciplines, National Competency Tests

Haertel, Edward H. – Educational Researcher, 1991
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) was originally used to report academic improvement or decline in the performance of 9-, 13-, and 17-year olds across major geographic regions. State-by-state comparison was carefully avoided. In 1988, however, Congress authorized the NAEP to conduct voluntary Trial State Assessments. (CJS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education

Phillips, Gary W. – Educational Researcher, 1991
Suggests that the National Assessment of Educational Progress's (NAEP) Trial State Assessment (TSA) will provide reliable and valid state-by-state comparisons of what students have learned and will assess their progress over time. The TSA will also provide information on home learning environments, instructional practices, educational resources,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education

Koretz, Daniel M. – Educational Researcher, 1991
Suggests that the proposed state-by-state National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) will be unable to provide information about which state programs are responsible for differences in test scores. Raises concerns about its cost effectiveness and potential loss of validity if used in state comparisons. (CJS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education