Descriptor
Criticism | 4 |
Phonics | 4 |
Reading Instruction | 4 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Reading Research | 3 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Centralization | 1 |
Educational Policy | 1 |
Educational Quality | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Stakes Tests | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Edmondson, Jacqueline | 1 |
Ehri, Linnea | 1 |
Garan, Elaine M. | 1 |
Shannon, Patrick | 1 |
Stahl, Steven A. | 1 |
Sweet, Robert W., Jr. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ehri, Linnea; Stahl, Steven A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2001
Authors take issue with an article by Elaine Garan, "Beyond the Smoke and Mirrors: A Critique of the National Reading Panel Report on Phonics," that appeared in the March 2001 issue of "Phi Delta Kappan" wherein she criticized the report's findings on the effectiveness of phonics instruction in helping children to read. (PKP)
Descriptors: Criticism, Elementary Secondary Education, Phonics, Reading Instruction
Garan, Elaine M. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2001
Author makes a point-by-point rebuttal to Ehri and Stahl's criticism of her critical analysis of the National Reading Panel report on the effectiveness of phonics instruction in helping children to read. (PKP)
Descriptors: Criticism, Elementary Secondary Education, Phonics, Reading Instruction

Sweet, Robert W., Jr. – Policy Review, 1997
Explains why the Clinton administration's answer to illiteracy, embodied in the "America Reads Challenge," in the United States is not a solution and only diverts accountability from the failure of the public-education system. It argues that phonics is the best way to teach reading and provides the principles of reading instruction. (GR)
Descriptors: Criticism, Educational Quality, Elementary Secondary Education, Illiteracy
Edmondson, Jacqueline; Shannon, Patrick – Journal of Research in Rural Education, 2003
Case study of a poor, rural Pennsylvania school district's experience with the Reading First initiative illustrates how the No Child Left Behind Act confines districts to a few federally prescribed, "scientifically proven" curricula that ignore local conditions. Sanctioned schools are negatively labeled but receive inadequate funding,…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Centralization, Criticism, Educational Policy