NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Type
Journal Articles1
Opinion Papers1
Education Level
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing one result Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Urofsky, Melvin I. – History Teacher, 1990
Examines the philosophical and judicial conflicts on the U.S. Supreme Court between justices Douglas and Frankfurter. Traces their disagreements citing specific court cases. States they represented judicial activism and judicial restraint. Concludes it is possible that the country benefited from the philosophical tensions and debates generated by…
Descriptors: Conflict, Constitutional Law, Court Judges, Court Litigation