Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 16 |
Reputation | 16 |
Higher Education | 14 |
Rating Scales | 6 |
Educational Quality | 5 |
Institutional Characteristics | 5 |
Mass Media | 5 |
College Choice | 3 |
Evaluation Criteria | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Validity | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Webster, David S. | 2 |
Astin, Alexander W. | 1 |
Austin, Betty J. | 1 |
Corcoran, Kevin | 1 |
Fincher, Cameron | 1 |
Gilley, J. Wade | 1 |
Hay, Tina M. | 1 |
Hendrickson, Robert M. | 1 |
Kirk, Stuart A. | 1 |
Machung, Anne | 1 |
McGuire, Michael D. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 16 |
Journal Articles | 13 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Historical Materials | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 5 |
Administrators | 3 |
Teachers | 2 |
Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rowlands, Julie – Quality in Higher Education, 2013
While much research on quality assurance in higher education has centred on issues related to the impact on teaching and learning and academic staff, there is a significant gap in the area of quality assurance and academic governance. Within Australia the roles of university academic boards (also known as academic senates or faculty senates) have…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Quality Assurance
Zinn, Tracy E. – Teaching of Psychology, 2010
Scott O. Lilienfeld is a professor of psychology at Emory University, in Atlanta, Georgia. Dr. Lilienfeld is founder and editor of the journal, "Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice," and is past president of the Society for a Science of Clinical Psychology. He has been a member of 11 journal editorial boards, including the…
Descriptors: Personality Assessment, Reputation, Interviews, Behavior
Obasi, Isaac N. – Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2008
The ranking of universities today is traceable to the pioneer efforts of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education in 1970 when it started the classification of US Colleges and Universities. But the present-day ranking of universities in a form of league table at national levels was started in 1983 by the US News and World Report, and was later…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Reputation, Classification
Astin, Alexander W. – National Forum: Phi Kappa Phi Journal, 1984
It is argued that equal education and excellence are not mutually incompatible, but that by embracing new and more valid conceptions of excellence, both can be achieved. Two approaches to assessing institutional quality are compared: reputational, based on consensus of opinion, and resource, based on quantitative measures. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Definitions, Educational Quality, Equal Education

Orr, Daniel – Change, 1984
Opinions about quality are seen as the only relevant measures of quality that can be collected. A different view of quality in higher education, and a different set of university rankings are proposed. A system that draws pairwise comparisons of university performance across nine disciplines is described. (MLW)
Descriptors: Colleges, Comparative Analysis, Educational Quality, Higher Education

Gilley, J. Wade – Academe, 1992
Rankings of colleges and universities in the popular press have two problems: (1) they are gimmicks to sell publications; and (2) institutions have become pawns, juggling numbers in quest of higher rankings, the ethical equivalent of cheating. Higher education must return to truth, fairness, and honesty to regain its purpose and integrity. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Educational Quality, Ethics
Webster, David S. – 1984
The "Flexner Report" of 1910, which described 155 U.S. and Canadian medical schools, is discussed, along with its influence on later studies of academic quality. Scholars almost universally agree that the Flexner Report dramatically changed the nature of medical education in the United States, although they disagree about how this…
Descriptors: Colleges, Comparative Analysis, Educational History, Educational Quality

Webster, David S.; Skinner, Tad – Change, 1996
A discussion of the National Research Council's 1995 ranking of research-doctorate programs in the United States criticizes the report for what it does not address, particularly comparisons with the information it disseminated in a 1982 report, some data discrepancies, and central issues such as an institution's available methods of instruction,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Doctoral Programs, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics

Kirk, Stuart A.; Corcoran, Kevin – Journal of Social Work Education, 1995
A 1994 "U.S. News and World Report" ranking of professional schools of social work is examined and compared with the findings of 8 other attempts to rank social work schools in the last 20 years. Results indicate that the assessment measures used were primarily faculty products (for example, articles published), and that the reputational…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics, Peer Evaluation

Machung, Anne – Change, 1998
The "U.S. News and World Report" rankings of colleges do not affect institutions equally; the schools impacted most are those that have the most to lose because they benefit from, even rely on, the rankings for prestige and visibility. The magazine relies on the rankings for substantial sales revenues, and has garnered considerable power…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Williams, Roger L.; Hendrickson, Robert M. – AGB Reports, 1986
The key variable in attracting private financial support is no longer private versus public status. Instead it is institutional prestige and a number of factors related to perceptions of institutional value, including direction, mission, strength of leadership, and distinctive features. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Role, Comparative Analysis, Endowment Funds, Fund Raising
Hay, Tina M. – Currents, 1992
Although higher education institutions dislike rankings published in the mass media, they like the attention the rankings create and prefer to be included rather than excluded. Common criticisms of the methodology include emphasis on inappropriate criteria, unfair comparison of private and public institutions, faulty assumptions, inaccurate data,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Mass Media
Wright, B. Ann – College Board Review, 1991
Media ranking of colleges is often superficial and only further confuses families and prospective students. In addition, some colleges are excluding students to present a "selective" profile. Rationality in admissions can return, when parents and students become knowledgeable about the process, counselors interpret changes, and colleges give…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, College Admission, College Bound Students, College Choice
Austin, Betty J. – 1984
The publication rates of female versus male faculty and factors that influence scholarly productivity for women faculty are discussed, based on the research literature. The academic reward structure and the payoffs resulting from scholarly productivity are also considered, along with the impact of productivity on building the reputations both of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Employment Level, Faculty Promotion, Females

McGuire, Michael D. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
It is argued that research testing the reliability and validity of college and university reputational studies should be conducted, a concern not raised by consumers and publishers. Two studies of "America's Best Colleges," published by "U.S. News and World Report," raise questions about the guide's validity and suggest that…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2