NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Engelhard, George, Jr.; Behizadeh, Nadia – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
In his article, Paul E. Newton has conducted a review of selected perspectives on validity theory with the goal of disambiguating the definition of validity and describing a consensus definition of validity. Newton provides a nuanced discussion of the evolution of the concept of validity over the years. His Focus article has two major goals: (1)…
Descriptors: Validity, Psychological Testing, Researchers, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rupp, Andre A. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
In the focus article of this issue, von Davier, Naemi, and Roberts essentially coupled: (1) a short methodological review of structural similarities of latent variable models with discrete and continuous latent variables; and (2) 2 short empirical case studies that show how these models can be applied to real, rather than simulated, large-scale…
Descriptors: Models, Classification, Multivariate Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Waltman, Ludo; Costas, Rodrigo; van Eck, Nees Jan – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
The literature on bibliometric indices for assessing scholarly impact, in particular the "h" index (Hirsch, 2005) and its many variants, is extensive, but nevertheless Ruscio and colleagues (this issue) succeed in making a valuable contribution. They have made the effort of collecting publication and citation data for no less than 1,750…
Descriptors: Evidence, Citations (References), Periodicals, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haslam, Nick – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Ruscio and colleagues (Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, & Mahalchik, this issue) have done a great service by systematically comparing indices of scholarly impact. Three aspects of their work are particularly valuable: (1) Their assessment of the proliferating collection of metrics, whose development has become something of a cottage industry,…
Descriptors: Psychology, Authors, Measurement, Outcome Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Panaretos, John; Malesios, Chrisovaladis C. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
In their article Ruscio et al. (Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, & Mahalchik, this issue) present a comparative study of some of the different variants of the "h" index. The study evaluates a total of 22 metrics, including the "h" index and "h"-type indices, as well as other conventional measures. The novelty of their work is to a large extent…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Usability, Statistical Analysis, Productivity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Porter, Theodore M. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Ruscio et al. (Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, & Mahalchik, this issue) write of a thing with which scientists and scholars are all too familiar, the assessment of published research and of its authors. The author was startled to discover how little the agenda of the paper seems to engage with factors one relies on for salary and promotion…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Data Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feller, Irwin – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2005
This article presents the author's critique of "Measurement of Central Aspects of Scientific Research: Performance, Interdisciplinarity, Structure," by Anthony F. J. van Raan. The author states that van Raan's article provides an excellent, if tightly compressed, introduction to key findings and innovative methods of the accumulating and…
Descriptors: Research and Development, Scientific Research, Citation Analysis, Researchers