Descriptor
College Administration | 4 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Retirement Benefits | 4 |
Investment | 3 |
Money Management | 3 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Competition | 2 |
Personnel Policy | 2 |
Program Effectiveness | 2 |
Teacher Retirement | 2 |
Age Discrimination | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Business Officer | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 4 |
Practitioners | 4 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wharton, Clifton R., Jr. – Business Officer, 1991
The chief executive officer of the Teachers' Insurance and Annuities Fund-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF) discusses the current widespread concern over retirement issues in general and the ending of mandatory retirement ages for college faculty. Changes in TIAA-CREF policies and practices affecting range and coverage of retirement…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Higher Education, Investment
Bernstein, Melvin H. – Business Officer, 1991
Results of a survey of 15 colleges and universities switching away, at least in part, from investment in the Teachers' Insurance and Annuities Fund and College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF) for faculty retirement illustrate a trend toward increased competition and some definite patterns in fund preference. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Competition, Economic Change
Knopf, Winfield G. – Business Officer, 1994
A number of economic and social factors suggest that this is an appropriate time for colleges and universities to review employee retirement plans. Information that employees should have for retirement planning is reviewed, and basic principles for institutions to use in selecting a pension company are outlined. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Competition, Costs
Morrell, Louis R. – Business Officer, 1993
The uncapping of college faculty retirement age in 1994 has implications for tenure, retirement programs, and potential for age discrimination litigation. Institutions should carefully examine the probable impact of the change on the quality of their academic programs and financial situation and develop contingency plans as early as possible. (MSE)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, College Administration, College Planning, Early Retirement