NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
MacCann, Robert G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
It is shown that the Angoff and bookmarking cut scores are examples of true score equating that in the real world must be applied to observed scores. In the context of defining minimal competency, the percentage "failed" by such methods is a function of the length of the measuring instrument. It is argued that this length is largely…
Descriptors: True Scores, Cutting Scores, Minimum Competencies, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hay, John – English in Australia, 1982
Makes certain observations relating to the use of general-impression marking as a partial determinant of admission to tertiary educational institutions in Western Australia. (HOD)
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Holistic Evaluation, National Competency Tests, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andre, Kate – Nurse Education Today, 2000
Although assessment of nursing students' clinical performance is difficult, objections to grading may be based on erroneous assumptions. A combination of criterion- and norm-referenced assessment can clarify minimum competency requirements and reward meritorious performance. (SK)
Descriptors: Clinical Experience, Competence, Criterion Referenced Tests, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thomson, Jack – English in Australia, 1998
Claims that arguments about the invalidity, purposelessness, and misleading nature of ELLA (English Language and Literacy Assessment ) implemented in New South Wales, Australia, remain intact despite attempts to counter the arguments. Presents a detailed critique of arguments presented in an article in the previous of this journal supporting ELLA.…
Descriptors: English Instruction, Foreign Countries, Language Arts, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Over, Ray – Australian Universities' Review, 1994
The place of peer review in the process by which the Australian Research Council allocates funds under the Large Grants Scheme, the primary funding source for basic research, is examined. Validity and reliability of peer review, the decision-making process, and cost effectiveness of the procedures are considered. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries