NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Johnson, Doug – Phi Delta Kappan, 2004
Mr. Johnson has discovered that the higher the level of student engagement and creativity, the lower the probability of plagiarism. For teachers who would like to see such desirable results, he describes the characteristics of assignments that are most likely to produce them. Two scenarios of types of assignments that avoid plagiarism are…
Descriptors: Assignments, Plagiarism, Student Participation, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Raffetto, William G. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1985
Enumerates 14 forms of academic dishonesty in higher education. Sees lack of confidence and parental/peer pressure as possible causes. Suggests preventive measures for faculty. Urges administrators to create an environment conducive to learning and excellence and protect against unfair competition for grades. (DMM)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Cheating, Community Colleges, Discipline Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caldwell, Edward C. – Teaching of Psychology, 1985
Low-level content and cheating are two problems that are serious threats to the personalized system of instruction (PSI). The use of behavioral objectives can reduce book-boundness and consequently raise the level of course content. To prevent cheating in PSI courses, rigorous checks on proctor grading must be built into courses. (RM)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Cheating, Course Content, Educational Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Odom, John G. – Journal of Dental Education, 1991
Ramifications of cheating include underqualified graduates and the probable continuation of unethical behavior into dental practice. Dental educators are encouraged to stress pride in professionalism, to reinforce positive student behaviors, and to administer swift punishment to violators. (DB)
Descriptors: Cheating, Dental Schools, Dental Students, Dentists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Collura, Frank J. – Journal of Dental Education, 1997
In cases of cheating, plagiarism, or violations of the law in dental education, a very high level of due process is required. University counsel can help administrators determine whether an accused student is professionally suited to dentistry by characterizing as many corrective actions as possible as academic under the rubric of "suitability to…
Descriptors: Cheating, Consultants, Dental Schools, Dental Students
California Community Colleges, Sacramento. Academic Senate. – 1994
In 1987, the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges (ASCCC) adopted a faculty ethics statement developed by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) detailing faculty responsibilities to their disciplines, as teachers, as colleagues, and as members of academic institutions. To make the AAUP statement more relevant to…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ozar, David T. – Journal of Dental Education, 1991
The ethics of cheating among dental students is considered, including why cheating is wrong, the commercial model of dentistry, the guild model of dentistry, and the more desirable interactive model focusing on the dentist-patient relationship. Cheating's effects on the teacher student relationship and the need to respond appropriately are…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dental Schools, Dental Students, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnston, D. Kay – Journal of Moral Education, 1991
Discusses the application of moral orientations of justice and care in the context of classroom cheating incident. Explores the everyday moral choices inherent in teaching. Defines teaching as a relational activity concerned fundamentally with morality. (DK)
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Integrity, Interpersonal Relationship