Descriptor
Source
American School Board Journal | 3 |
Executive Educator | 2 |
American School and University | 1 |
Journal of Law and Education | 1 |
Author
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin | 3 |
Splitt, David A. | 2 |
Franklin, David L. | 1 |
Shaughnessy, Mary Angela | 1 |
Sultanik, Jeffrey T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 8 |
Journal Articles | 7 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 8 |
Practitioners | 8 |
Parents | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Students | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
New Jersey v TLO | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 2003
A decision by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case from Minnesota illustrates the difficulties schools face in deciding when and how to search a student for possible weapons or drugs. Case shows courts tend to give school officials a measure of flexibility when applying the law. Advises board members and administrators to consult with…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Drug Use, Elementary Secondary Education, School Law
Franklin, David L. – American School and University, 1985
The United States Supreme Court's first decision on student search and seizure required that school officials have reasonable cause in conducting a search in order to enforce school rules or counter a threat to the school environment. Not analyzed was when a search will be considered intrusive. (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Public Schools
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1985
Washington's State Supreme Court held unconstitutional a secondary school's routine search of the luggage of all students participating in a school-sponsored overnight trip. Such general searches are not permitted, and schools can find other means of ensuring good student discipline. (PGD)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Field Trips, Privacy
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1997
A case involving a strip-search of two second-grade girls in Talledega, Alabama, was dismissed with an eight-to-three vote by the 11th Circuit Court. The court issued an opinion on only one question in the case: whether the employees involved were entitled to "qualified immunity." Advises administrators to be cautious and permit strip…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Federal Courts

Sultanik, Jeffrey T. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
In response to an earlier article by Eugene Lincoln, presents two hypothetical cases that respectively deal with the possible effects of drug use on school premises and with a policy governing mandatory urine testing for student athletes. Cites factors that should be incorporated in any mandatory drug testing policy. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1986
Detection of drug users at school is a problem complicated by recent New Jersey court cases upholding students' privacy rights against mandatory medical examinations and search-and-seizure actions. Requiring confidential medical screening by private physicians for sports and other extracurricular activities is an alternative strategy offering…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Drug Abuse, Elementary Secondary Education
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1999
The recent decision of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in "Miller," based on the school district's interest in preventing possible abuse, gave legal support for random, suspiciousless drug testing of students. Contends this is a "slippery slope" argument, that the key factor in deciding whether to adopt a policy of random drug testing should…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Shaughnessy, Mary Angela – 1991
The laws affecting education in the United States today can generally be classified according to four categories: (1) Constitutional law (both state and federal); (2) statutes and regulations; (3) common law principles; and (4) contract law. Students and teachers in private schools are not protected by federal Constitutional law because they are…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Catholic Schools, Confidential Records, Court Litigation