Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Advanced Placement Programs | 2 |
| Evidence Based Practice | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Protocol Analysis | 1 |
| Test Items | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| College Board | 2 |
Author
| Huff, Kristen | 2 |
| France, Megan | 1 |
| Kaliski, Pamela | 1 |
| Matts, Tom | 1 |
| Steinberg, Linda | 1 |
| Thurber, Allison | 1 |
Publication Type
| Non-Print Media | 2 |
| Reference Materials - General | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textKaliski, Pamela; France, Megan; Huff, Kristen; Thurber, Allison – College Board, 2011
Developing a cognitive model of task performance is an important and often overlooked phase in assessment design; failing to establish such a model can threaten the validity of the inferences made from the scores produced by an assessment (e.g., Leighton, 2004). Conducting think aloud interviews (TAIs), where students think aloud while completing…
Descriptors: World History, Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Protocol Analysis
Huff, Kristen; Steinberg, Linda; Matts, Tom – College Board, 2009
Presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego, CA in April 2009. This presentation provides an overview of ECD. In addition, the presentation describes the benefits of, as well as the challenges that were faced, in implementing ECD in the Advanced Placement Program.
Descriptors: Measurement, Evidence Based Practice, Test Construction, Advanced Placement Programs
