NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards2
Showing 106 to 120 of 835 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shibanova, E. Yu.; Platonova, D. P.; Lisyutkin, M. A. – Russian Education & Society, 2018
The article presents the results of an analytical study that explores the development patterns of universities that participate in the Russian Academic Excellence Initiative (the 5-100 Project) in terms of their financing structure, their priority development areas, and the trends for key performance indicators. By using statistical methods,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Educational Development, Educational Trends
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sezonova, Olga N.; Galchenko, Svetlana A.; Khodirevskaya, Valentina N. – European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2016
The modern market relations open provide new opportunities of development for higher educational institutions, however the majority of universities aren't ready for effective and independent business management yet. At the turn of the 21st century many educational institutions faced such problems as scarcity of federal financing, fundamental…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Efficiency, Labor Force Development, Achievement Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zanzzi, Fabricio; Bernabé, Lorena; Fernández, Jair; Marquez-Pinoargote, Claudia – Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 2019
This research compared the economics curriculum of the economics undergraduate programs of the best universities in the world, and those of universities within a developing country (Ecuador), in order to show the basic formal differences and the common characteristics (intra-rankings and inter-rankings). The proposed comparison criteria were…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Comparative Education, Universities, Undergraduate Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Taylor, Z. W.; Alsmadi, Izzat – Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 2020
In an era of billions of dollars in outstanding student loan debt, researchers have posited that the U.S. News & World Report rankings continue to be an influential source of information for prospective students, yet these rankings do not include college affordability metrics in their ranking algorithm. As a result, this study performed a…
Descriptors: Paying for College, Universities, Institutional Characteristics, Achievement Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simpson, Adrian – Studies in Higher Education, 2018
University league tables give the image that there is a single dimension along which institutions can be placed. Most derive rankings from an aggregate score of multiple items, which often include opinion responses which has the potential to introduce sampling bias. This paper explores what happens when the two issues of dimensionality and…
Descriptors: Universities, Rating Scales, Achievement Rating, Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wyse, Adam E. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2018
One common modification to the Angoff standard-setting method is to have panelists round their ratings to the nearest 0.05 or 0.10 instead of 0.01. Several reasons have been offered as to why it may make sense to have panelists round their ratings to the nearest 0.05 or 0.10. In this article, we examine one reason that has been suggested, which is…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluation Criteria, Scoring Formulas, Achievement Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Blair, Bryan J.; Shawler, Lesley A.; Debacher, Emily A.; Harper, Jill M.; Dorsey, Michael F. – Education and Treatment of Children, 2018
In an analysis of publication rates in applied behavior analysis, Dixon, Reed, Smith, Belisle, and Jackson (2015a) argued the need to measure the research productivity of graduate programs as a means of informing prospective graduate students. The current study replicated and extended Dixon, et al. (2015a) by analyzing the number of publications…
Descriptors: Graduate Study, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Teacher Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pitts, Christine; Anderson, Ross; Haney, Michele – Learning Environments Research, 2018
The purpose of the current study was to estimate reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the Measure of Instruction for Creative Engagement (MICE) instrument. The MICE uses an iterative process of evidence collection and scoring through teacher observations to determine instructional domain ratings and overall scores. The…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Achievement Rating, Outcome Measures, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Duygu Ileritürk,; Kincal, Remzi Y. – International Journal of Instruction, 2018
It was thought in this study that it was important to analyze the countries' economic situation and patent production based on their information transfers via their success rankings in PISA, which determined their success internationally. Therefore, it was aimed to analyze the countries' success in participation into the PISA 2012. Case study…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Intellectual Property, Achievement Tests, International Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goodman, Roger; Oka, Chinami – Oxford Review of Education, 2018
This paper explores the development of the "hensachi" system in Japanese education from the 1960s when it first appeared as a "de facto" measure for scholastic achievement. Unlike absolute scoring systems (such as A-level grades) "hensachi" gave an indication of the probability of getting a place on a particular…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scores, Achievement Rating, Educational History
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Jeongeun; Shim, Woo-jeong – Review of Higher Education, 2019
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of college rankings, by investigating to what extent measurements employed by rankings are good proxies for evaluating educational practices at liberal arts colleges. Using a hierarchical linear modeling with data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, Integrated…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Achievement Rating, Institutional Characteristics, Reputation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bougnol, Marie-Laure; Dulá, Jose H. – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2015
Academicians, experts, and other stakeholders have contributed extensively to the literature on university rankings also known as "league tables". Often the tone is critical usually focused on the subjective aspects of the process; e.g., the list of the universities' attributes used in the rankings, their respective weights, and the size…
Descriptors: Universities, Achievement Rating, Institutional Characteristics, Data Interpretation
Gross, Karen – New England Journal of Higher Education, 2018
Karen Gross, former president of Southern Vermont College and author of "Breakaway Learners: Strategies for Post-Secondary Success with At-Risk Students," writes of the impact the recent March for Our Lives at hundreds of locations around the globe had on her. As she stood in the middle of hundreds of thousands of protesters in…
Descriptors: Colleges, Universities, Achievement Rating, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Henman, Paul; Brown, Scott D.; Dennis, Simon – Australian Universities' Review, 2017
In 2015, the Australian Government's Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) assessment of research quality declined to rate 1.5 per cent of submissions from universities. The public debate focused on practices of gaming or "coding errors" within university submissions as the reason for this outcome. The issue was about the…
Descriptors: Rating Scales, Foreign Countries, Universities, Achievement Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lim, Miguel Antonio; Williams Øerberg, Jakob – Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2017
This article questions the existing understanding of how global university rankings work to coordinate higher education policy. Rankings are often analyzed as accelerators of reform processes while their differences are overlooked. We suggest studying the particular encounters between rankers and national policy contexts as occasions for friction…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Achievement Rating, Institutional Characteristics
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  ...  |  56