NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Uhoman, Anyi Mary – Journal of Education and Practice, 2017
This study entitled "Level of Discipline Among University Academic Staff as a Correlate of University Development in Nigeria" adopted the correlation design with a population of 2,301 academic staff purposively selected from four Universities in the North-Central Geo-Political zone of Nigeria. The Stratified Random Sampling Method was…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Correlation, College Faculty, Questionnaires
McCormick, Kathleen – American School Board Journal, 1985
The peer review system for evaluating schools (the "Toledo Plan") is gaining favor among teachers in other school systems. Schools are generally reluctant to dismiss incompetent teachers because of documentation complexities, but incompetent teachers should nevertheless be weeded out. (TE)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Due Process, Peer Evaluation, Personnel Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Palfreyman, David – Education and the Law, 2005
The article compares the employment regime for academics in UK HEIs with that of faculty in US HEIs. It considers, "inter alia", "progressive discipline", "at will contracts", "the Model Statute", "academic freedom", "faculty misconduct" and "academic underperformance".…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Comparative Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 1980
The sequence of events and implications of the disciplinary dismissal of three faculty members of Philander Smith College are discussed with relation to the AAUP's 1940 Statement of Principles. It is concluded that faculty rights were violated by the administration and governing board. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Administrative Policy, Case Studies, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 1980
The denial of tenure to and dismissal of an assistant professor at Nichols College are considered. It is concluded that he was denied due process according to the AAUP's 1940 Statement of Principles. No issue of academic freedom was raised by the decision; however, the administration's action is criticized. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Administrative Policy, Case Studies, College Faculty