Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Finno Ugric Languages | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Freehand Drawing | 1 |
| Individual Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Kindergarten | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Estonia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Metropolitan Readiness Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkHaidkind, Pille; Kikas, Eve; Henno, Helen; Peets, Terje – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2011
Controlled Drawing Observation (CDO) was developed by Tove Krogh and it has been used in Denmark, Finland and Estonia for assessing a child's readiness for school. CDO is a group test, it gives information about a child's functioning in an educational setting and it serves as a starting point for later individual assessment. The goal of the study…
Descriptors: School Readiness, Observation, Group Testing, Mathematics Achievement
Peer reviewedSwanson, Beverly B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Samples of entering first-grade students were used to examine the predictive validity of the group administered Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT) and the individually administered Meeting Street School Screening Test (MSSST). The advantage of the latter was found to possibly outweigh the advantage of efficiency in group administration. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Grade 1, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Predictive Validity
